Join the Conversation
- Find Answers
- :
- Splunk Administration
- :
- Monitoring Splunk
- :
- Re: My Search Is Faster the Second and "X" times I...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark Topic
- Subscribe to Topic
- Mute Topic
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
When I ran a search spanning an entire year it took 241 seconds. If I immediately rerun the search the time plummets to ~60 seconds. Why? Is this a Splunk or Disk optimization?
Background:
hot/warm sit on fast disk.
coldlib resides on not as fast, bigger disk.
Regardless of the search I run, when the data is polled the first time it's always a slower reply. When the I rerun the same exact search over the same exact disks the times drop considerably. Who's responsible? (who can I thank?) Splunk or Disks....and is it that easy, or is it more complex? I understand that searching back onto colddb disks will require a slower retrieval vs. warm/hotdb. The question is more of a lower level, backend one. But one I want to share with my user base when I advise them how to tune their searches and what will happen when they rerun the search.
I've looked through a lot of the Answers and on Splunk's site but can't really find the answer. This group is outstanding, so I'm leaning on you. Any insight is appreciated.
pstein
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Splunk caches search results for a set period of time (configurable by the admin)
So if you run the exact same search while the data is still cached - the search will return results much faster the second time
But the search must truly be identical
Edit
It's not exactly for a set period of time, it's related to your user (and/or role) disk quota - https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.0.1/Admin/authorizeconf (though search results expiration time does factor in)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've had different experiences - so long as the search is truly identical
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Which it is/was. Identical search run repeatedly produced different execution times.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did the second run take zero seconds? If not then it didn't reuse the previous search's results from dispatch where the disk quota settings apply.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
No. It didn't take zero time to execute.
First/Original run: 6,273,099 events in 142.291 seconds
Second run: 6,273,099 events in 56.79 seconds.
.conf25 technical session recap of Observability for Gen AI: Monitoring LLM ...
A Season of Skills: New Splunk Courses to Light Up Your Learning Journey
Announcing the Migration of the Splunk Add-on for Microsoft Azure Inputs to ...
