Knowledge Management

[Smartstore]Is maxVolumeDataSizeMB relevent for mixed local and remote index cluster

rbal_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I wanted to get confirmation on how space is managed on a mixed local and remote index cluster.

I know that maxVolumeDataSizeMB is ignored on remote/s3 enabled indexes, and that eviction_padding in server.conf can control how the cachemanager will start evicting from local cache on the indexers.

Labels (1)
Tags (1)
0 Karma

rbal_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

maxvolumedatasizeMB is ignored and can lead to disk filling up unexpectedly. Depending on version of splunk, it will either start evicting evictable buckets at the eviction_padding threshold or it wont evict and then eventually pause indexing when it hits minfreespace.

Advice is not to have s2 indexes and non-s2 indexes in the same volume with maxvolumedatasizeMB as it's unlikely either of the above behaviors are desired. They should keep non-s2 and s2 indexes in separate volumes.

0 Karma

srajarat2
Path Finder

How about the indexes that were migrated to SmartStore? The homePath remains the same after migration and it refers to a volume that had maxVolumeDataSizeMB.

Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Data Persistence in the OpenTelemetry Collector

This blog post is part of an ongoing series on OpenTelemetry. What happens if the OpenTelemetry collector ...

Introducing Splunk 10.0: Smarter, Faster, and More Powerful Than Ever

Now On Demand Whether you're managing complex deployments or looking to future-proof your data ...

Community Content Calendar, September edition

Welcome to another insightful post from our Community Content Calendar! We're thrilled to continue bringing ...