Knowledge Management

Datamodel size on disk doesn't make sense?

TheBravoSierra
Path Finder

My Web Datamodel was set to 3 months with 67 GB+ size on disk. I reduced the summary range to 1 month, and size on disk increased to 100 GB+ size on disk. This doesn't make sense, can someone help explain? I would've thought less time range equated to less size on disk. 

Labels (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @TheBravoSierra,

I suppose that you rebuilded the DataModel after time reduction.

If no, rebuild it and the disk occupation should be less, if you already did, opena a case to Splunk Support because there isn't any reason for this behaviour.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

View solution in original post

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @TheBravoSierra,

I suppose that you rebuilded the DataModel after time reduction.

If no, rebuild it and the disk occupation should be less, if you already did, opena a case to Splunk Support because there isn't any reason for this behaviour.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Archived Metrics Now Available for APAC and EMEA realms

We’re excited to announce the launch of Archived Metrics in Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring for our customers ...

Detecting Remote Code Executions With the Splunk Threat Research Team

WATCH NOWRemote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities pose a significant risk to organizations. If exploited, ...

Enter the Dashboard Challenge and Watch the .conf24 Global Broadcast!

The Splunk Community Dashboard Challenge is still happening, and it's not too late to enter for the week of ...