Getting Data In

Why are there duplicate MV fields with JSON data?

pcontreras
Explorer

Hello there!

I'm trying to ingest JSON data via the Splunk Add-on for Microsoft Cloud Services app.  I created a sourcetype with INDEXED_EXTRACTIONS=json and left all other settings to their default values.  The data got ingested, however, when I table my events I start seeing mv fields with duplicate data.  I'm even seeing the "Interesting Fields" section add up to 200% (instead of the expected 100%).

Sourcetype settingsSourcetype settings

 

Interesting FieldsInteresting Fields

 

MV Fields with duplicate dataMV Fields with duplicate data

 

https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/JSON-format-Duplicate-value-in-field/m-p/306811

I then followed the advice given in this post ^^^ (i.e., setting KV_MODE=none, AUTO_KV_JSON=false, etc.) but the issue persists.

I have attached screenshots to this post to better understand my situation.  I'm currently on Splunk Cloud.

Any help with this is greatly appreciated

Labels (2)
0 Karma

yuanliu
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

One common mistake is described in Structured Data Header Extraction and configuration.

* When 'INDEXED_EXTRACTIONS = JSON' for a particular source type, do not also 
  set 'KV_MODE = json' for that source type. This causes the Splunk software to 
  extract the JSON fields twice: once at index time, and again at search time.
* Default: not set
0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Automatic Discovery Part 1: What is Automatic Discovery in Splunk Observability Cloud ...

If you’ve ever deployed a new database cluster, spun up a caching layer, or added a load balancer, you know it ...

Real-Time Fraud Detection: How Splunk Dashboards Protect Financial Institutions

Financial fraud isn't slowing down. If anything, it's getting more sophisticated. Account takeovers, credit ...

Splunk + ThousandEyes: Correlate frontend, app, and network data to troubleshoot ...

 Are you tired of troubleshooting delays caused by siloed frontend, application, and network data? We've got a ...