Getting Data In

Convert datetime(in user format) extracted from field to splunk understandable format

adityapavan18
Contributor

I have time logged in as the below format
....
2011-11-18T00:00:00
....

I am able to extract that time using field extraction to get
OrderDate as 2011-11-18T00:00:00

Is there any way to convert that value to format

2011/11/18 00:00:00

The reason for this is i need to find diffrence between times, and i cannot do it if time is in format of 2011-11-18T00:00:00
Please suggest me ideas to implement this.

Tags (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

Ayn
Legend
... | eval ReformattedOrderDate=strptime(OrderDate,"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S")

This will return the corresponding epoch value for the timestamp, which should be appropriate to use when comparing times. If you want to use another time, use eval again with strftime.

View solution in original post

Ayn
Legend
... | eval ReformattedOrderDate=strptime(OrderDate,"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S")

This will return the corresponding epoch value for the timestamp, which should be appropriate to use when comparing times. If you want to use another time, use eval again with strftime.

adityapavan18
Contributor

thanks a lot for the help

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Event Series: Splunk Observability Metrics Cost Optimization

Balancing Scale and Spend: Gaining Control Over High-Volume Metrics in Splunk Observability Cloud As ...

Kick the Tires Before You Commit: A Hands-On Tour of the Splunk Observability Cloud ...

Evaluating an enterprise observability platform usually goes like this: fill out a form, get a free trial with ...

Deep insights, no barriers: Splunk Observability Cloud Free Edition

As software delivery cycles continue to accelerate, observability shouldn’t be a luxury — it should be a ...