Getting Data In

Are there adverse affects to having monitors for files that do not exist?

brent_weaver
Builder

I have two platforms to monitor. I want to create one application that I can apply to all hosts that come on board. I know that Spunk will not scream anymore with 6.2.x, but are there adverse affects? Will it create errors in the Spunk log files?

Tags (2)
0 Karma

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You won't see any errors, not finding a file is expected behaviour. You also won't see any performance issues if you keep the number of monitors reasonable. You might see unexpected indexing if one platform one day happens to create a file in a path that exists in the other platform.

For clarity, maintenance, extendability, fewer cross-platform dependencies, etc. I'd advise to create two tailored apps nonetheless.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Enterprise Security Content Update (ESCU) | New Releases

In the last month, the Splunk Threat Research Team (STRT) has had 1 release of new security content via the ...

There's No Place Like Chrome and the Splunk Platform

Watch On DemandMalware. Risky Extensions. Data Exfiltration. End-users are increasingly reliant on browsers to ...

The Great Resilience Quest: 5th Leaderboard Update

The fifth leaderboard update for The Great Resilience Quest is out >> 🏆 Check out the ...