Splunk Search

How to add to or subtract one hour to time tokens to be passed in a drilldown?

jravida
Communicator

Hi folks,

I'm running the transaction command in a drilldown panel that passes the times picked on the timechart down to the next panel as tokens. The problem I run into is where the transactions don't fall within the hour slice, I want the token to subtract an hour from the earliest time, and add an hour to the latest, so I can encompass the transaction.

I tried $earliest_time$ - 1h

Splunk says "Invalid earliest_time"

Is there a way to offset the tokens this way?

0 Karma

hopnscotch
Path Finder

Did you ever find a solution to this?

I've tried so many combinations of 'possible solutions' I've seen posted, but none of them have worked for me.

0 Karma

jeffland
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You could change your token before it is consumed by the search. Do this in your drilldown:

    <eval token="time_tok_plus_1h_earliest">relative_time(relative_time(now(), 'earliest'), "+1h")</eval>
    <eval token="time_tok_plus_1h_latest">relative_time(relative_time(now(), 'latest'), "+1h")</eval>

Replace earliest and latest with wherever your values come from, e.g. click.value.

somesoni2
Revered Legend

I guess the earliest and latest value that you get from the drilldown will in epoch, so try one of these in the drilldown search

your base search earliest=($earliest_time$-3600) ...rest of the search

OR

your base search [| gentimes start=-1 |eval earliest=$earliest_time$-3600 | table earliest ]
0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | Why did the turkey cross the road?

November 2025 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Enter the Agentic Era with Splunk AI Assistant for SPL 1.4

  &#x1f680; Your data just got a serious AI upgrade — are you ready? Say hello to the Agentic Era with the ...

Feel the Splunk Love: Real Stories from Real Customers

Hello Splunk Community,    What’s the best part of hearing how our customers use Splunk? Easy: the positive ...