Splunk Enterprise Security

EnterpriseSecurity - DataModels

astatrial
Contributor

Hi everyone,

Introduction:

We have Palo Alto products, and we have also installed the appropriate add-on and apps. We mapped the data into the data models and the relevant data model for my question is the Web data model .

There is a field called dest in the DM, and for datamodel web (for palo alto) i need its value to be "dest_hostname" (the current value is "dest_ip"). The current value is relevant for the Network Traffic DM, therefore i don't want to change it. 

Question: 

Is it OK to add additional fields to the built-in data models of Splunk ES, or is it not recommended? 

What are the downsides of action like this? 

 

Thanks ! 

Labels (1)
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Don't add fields to a DM unless absolutely necessary.  In your case, you should be able to add the dest field by creating a new field alias that maps dest_ip to dest.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

astatrial
Contributor

Hi @richgalloway ,

Thanks for the fast reply.

It is a bit problematic, as there is already a mapping from dest_ip to dest which is relevant for the "Network Traffic" data model. I need  the dest in Web data model to contain values from dest_hostname and not dest IP (for palo alto).

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Modern way of developing distributed application using OTel

Recently, I had the opportunity to work on a complex microservice using Spring boot and Quarkus to develop a ...

Enterprise Security Content Update (ESCU) | New Releases

Last month, the Splunk Threat Research Team had 3 releases of new security content via the Enterprise Security ...

Archived Metrics Now Available for APAC and EMEA realms

We’re excited to announce the launch of Archived Metrics in Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring for our customers ...