Splunk Dev

Output XML via a custom search command

mw
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I'm working on a custom search command which will take the results of a search and create an XML output file. As a very simplified example, the search might look like this:

source=a OR source=b | fields host, source, some_field | outputxml

Within my search command, I read the results and aggregate all of the stuff into Python dicts (e.g. source[type]['total'] += 1, source[type][value] += 1, etc), and then attempt to write the results to a randomly named output file, where the XML would look something like:

<xml>
  <source type="syslog" total="2">
    <some_field value="1" count="1"/>
    <some_field value="0" count="1"/>
  </source>
  <source type="dhcp" total="1">
    <some_field value="1" count="1"/>
  <source>
</xml>

However, I suppose due to map/reduce maybe, multiple output files are created with the results being spread among them. At least, I suppose that it would make sense to be a function of map/reduce, and actually rather cool to see in action.

Is my analysis correct? If so, what is the best practice for handling this merging of results into a single, highly structured output file where order matters?

Tags (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I would suggest that it might be easier to get what you want by calling the Splunk API:

wget --no-check-certificate --user=admin --password=changeme -O - --post-data='search sourcetype%3Dmysourcetype | head 2&exec_mode=oneshot' https://localhost:8089/services/search/jobs

There is also generally no need for you to worry about map-reduce. Splunk will take care of that. (It's possible to write map-reduceable search commands if you specify them as streaming, but converting CSV to XML and attempting to merge them in the reduce step is not an operation that will gain from what Splunk already does with the results.) So you can just worry about convert the CSV input to XML on a single node.

View solution in original post

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I would suggest that it might be easier to get what you want by calling the Splunk API:

wget --no-check-certificate --user=admin --password=changeme -O - --post-data='search sourcetype%3Dmysourcetype | head 2&exec_mode=oneshot' https://localhost:8089/services/search/jobs

There is also generally no need for you to worry about map-reduce. Splunk will take care of that. (It's possible to write map-reduceable search commands if you specify them as streaming, but converting CSV to XML and attempting to merge them in the reduce step is not an operation that will gain from what Splunk already does with the results.) So you can just worry about convert the CSV input to XML on a single node.

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Forwarder Topology Guidance: Intermediate HF vs Intermediate UF

Why Universal Forwarders Should Not Be Used as Intermediate Forwarders A practical Splunk forwarding topology ...

At .conf26, Don’t Just See What’s Next. Help Shape It at Innovation Labs.

Long before a new capability reaches the keynote stage, it begins as an idea waiting to be tested. At ...

Data Management Digest – August 2026

Data Management Digest   Welcome to the August 2026 edition of Data Management Digest! August was a big month ...