As in outlook.com ? If so, there is an article here describing how to connect to it via SMTP: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/pop-imap-and-smtp-settings-for-outlook-com-d088b986-291d-42b8-...
See more...
As in outlook.com ? If so, there is an article here describing how to connect to it via SMTP: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/pop-imap-and-smtp-settings-for-outlook-com-d088b986-291d-42b8-9564-9c414e2aa040 Enter the required credentials to your Splunk email settings, and it should work.
Could you try this SEDCMD in the props.conf file? (Make sure that the stanza is changed to match the sourcetype of the logs) [your_sourcetype]
SEDCMD-maskpasswords = s/password: ([^;]+);cpassword: (...
See more...
Could you try this SEDCMD in the props.conf file? (Make sure that the stanza is changed to match the sourcetype of the logs) [your_sourcetype]
SEDCMD-maskpasswords = s/password: ([^;]+);cpassword: ([^;]+);/password: ####;cpassword: ####;/g
@marnall - @richgalloway solution is creating false alerts and triggering alerts even when servers are up. Can you provide any other solution in such way that alert is not triggered in maintenance w...
See more...
@marnall - @richgalloway solution is creating false alerts and triggering alerts even when servers are up. Can you provide any other solution in such way that alert is not triggered in maintenance window even though servers are down but alert gets only triggered outside window with condition atleast one of the server is down
How do I take a dashboard global time (i.e. - $global_time.earliest$, $global_time.latest$) and convert it into a date to be used when searching a lookup file that only has a date column (i.e. - 04/1...
See more...
How do I take a dashboard global time (i.e. - $global_time.earliest$, $global_time.latest$) and convert it into a date to be used when searching a lookup file that only has a date column (i.e. - 04/15/2024)?
We need to easily identify the SQL submitted by DB Connect. We'd like to use Oracle's SET_MODULE procedure. How do we accomplish this in DB Connect? call DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE ( module...
See more...
We need to easily identify the SQL submitted by DB Connect. We'd like to use Oracle's SET_MODULE procedure. How do we accomplish this in DB Connect? call DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE ( module_name => 'Splunk_HF', action_name => 'DMP_Dashboard' ); <put our DB Input SQL here>
@richgalloway has a good solution. I think the "is_maintenance window" field in the condition has a typo so watch for that. Are either of you getting _time values when using "| eval current_time = _...
See more...
@richgalloway has a good solution. I think the "is_maintenance window" field in the condition has a typo so watch for that. Are either of you getting _time values when using "| eval current_time = _time" after tstats? There are no _time fields specified in the first tstats command. Perhaps it would work better with "| eval current_time = now()"
I have an inputlookup that has a list of pod names that we expect to be deployed to an environment. The list would look something like: pod_name_lookup,importance
poda,non-critical
podb,crit...
See more...
I have an inputlookup that has a list of pod names that we expect to be deployed to an environment. The list would look something like: pod_name_lookup,importance
poda,non-critical
podb,critical
podc,critical We also have data in splunk that gives us pod_name, status, and importance. Results from the below search would look like this: index=abc sourcetype=kubectl
| table pod_name, status, importance
poda-284489-cs834 Running non-critical
podb-834hgv8-cn28s Running critical Note podc was not found.. I need to be able to compare the results from this search to the list from the inputlookup and show that podc was not found in the results and that it is a critical pod. Need to be able to count how many critical and non-critical pods are not found as well as table the list of missing pods. I have tried several iterations of searches but havent came across one that allows me to compare a search result to an inputlookup using a partial match. eval result=if(like(pod_name_lookup...etc is close but requires a pattern and not the wildcard value of a field. Thoughts?
You could stats count by query. Queries that are found by both detections will have count=2, while queries that are found by only one will have count=1. Then you can filter for count=1 to remove the ...
See more...
You could stats count by query. Queries that are found by both detections will have count=2, while queries that are found by only one will have count=1. Then you can filter for count=1 to remove the hundreds of queries that are found by both detections. | stats count by query
| where count = 1
It appears that the Fortinet FortiWeb Add-On receives the data from a UDP data input. The instructions on the Splunkbase page describe how to set a syslog log export configuration on FortiWeb. You c...
See more...
It appears that the Fortinet FortiWeb Add-On receives the data from a UDP data input. The instructions on the Splunkbase page describe how to set a syslog log export configuration on FortiWeb. You could install this app on your indexers or a heavy forwarder to receive the logs directly from your FortiWeb device(s), but it's generally better to have a separate syslog server to collect logs rather than rely on Splunk's udp input. Your current log pipeline looks good. You could then install this app on your indexer tier so that the indexers perform index-time operations on the logs after receiving them from your syslog server. This app can also go on your search head to provide macros, eventtypes, and other knowledge objects used for searching. Because the app does not have any input configurations, it does not make sense to install it on a universal forwarder.
Are you saying that all the Application logs are not forwarding, or just the application logs for a specific source? There is a known issue with forwarder 9.0.4 where the event logs for Windows Defe...
See more...
Are you saying that all the Application logs are not forwarding, or just the application logs for a specific source? There is a known issue with forwarder 9.0.4 where the event logs for Windows Defender will stop forwarding, (until next restart) but other logs will forward. Perhaps this issue is related. https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.4/ReleaseNotes/KnownIssues Could you try updating your forwarder version and seeing if it fixes the issue?
Hi All, We have widnows event and other application logs ngested into splunk. There is no problem with windows event logs but for our application related logs, the logs stop suddenly and star...
See more...
Hi All, We have widnows event and other application logs ngested into splunk. There is no problem with windows event logs but for our application related logs, the logs stop suddenly and starts reporting again but the log file in windows is being continuously updated with recent logs though the modified time does not get updated because of the windows feature. The modified time for the log file is not an issue because the logs starts rolling in even when the modified time is same but the log file had latest logs. we are using splunk forwarder 9.0.4 version currently. Can someone please help in triaging this issue? It is a problem with only one specific source with this windows host and other sources (windows event logs) are flowing in properly.
It needs equal access as you have in GUI. If you need to access data then you need access to those indexes and same for internal indexes. The only exception is that there are some scheduled reports...
See more...
It needs equal access as you have in GUI. If you need to access data then you need access to those indexes and same for internal indexes. The only exception is that there are some scheduled reports which have run as owner. Those should work when you have access to those reports. But if those aren’t scheduled then that’s not working.
Since it's the same index with two different source types, could be SPL build differentially? -------------------
index=firewall (sourcetype=collector OR sourcetype=metadata) enforcement_mode=bloc...
See more...
Since it's the same index with two different source types, could be SPL build differentially? -------------------
index=firewall (sourcetype=collector OR sourcetype=metadata) enforcement_mode=block event_type="error"
|table event_type, hostname, ip
Thank you
Hi @tony.lao
If the reply helped answer your question, please click the “Accept as Solution” button on the reply. This confirmation that the question was answered alerts the community and helps bui...
See more...
Hi @tony.lao
If the reply helped answer your question, please click the “Accept as Solution” button on the reply. This confirmation that the question was answered alerts the community and helps build that bank of expertise for everyone in the community.
If the reply did not answer your question, jump back into the conversation to keep it going.
Thank you. Because in different data source I see host name under different fields i.e. in metadata "host1" and in collector just "host", I added rename
index=firewall event_type="error" [sear...
See more...
Thank you. Because in different data source I see host name under different fields i.e. in metadata "host1" and in collector just "host", I added rename
index=firewall event_type="error" [search index=firewall sourcetype="metadata" enforcement_mode=block
| rename host1 as host
|dedup host
| table host
| format]
| table event_type, host, ip
-------- Now I am back to square 1 - it runs but no events produced and never finish.