Splunk Search

| input lookup return ALL rather than specify number

robf
Path Finder

I'm trying to add this to my search but the number of lookup users may change!!

(|inputlookup lotsofusers.csv | return 3 $users)

((user1) OR (user2) OR (user3))

Is there a better way to do this? * does not work.

Thanks

Tags (2)

orion44
Communicator

It would be nice to know the answer to this question. Why do we have to specify a hardcoded value of records to return when using inputlookup? The logical thing to do is check all records.

0 Karma

somesoni2
Revered Legend

Give this a try

your base search  [|inputlookup lotsofusers.csv | eval search=users | table search]
0 Karma

aweitzman
Motivator

If you're using it as a subsearch, you can use the fields command to reduce what gets returned without needing return. Try this:

[|inputlookup lotsofusers.csv | fields users]

You should get all of them.

0 Karma

robf
Path Finder

thanks but this gives

((user=user1) OR (user=user2) OR (user=user3))

i want to search keywords only

((user1) OR (user2) OR (user3))

with the return command you can use the $ symbol to achieve this

0 Karma

aweitzman
Motivator

How about this:

[|inputlookup lotsofusers.csv | fields users | format | rex field=search mode=sed "s/user=//g"]

0 Karma

fdi01
Motivator

try as:
[|inputlookup lotsofusers.csv | return 3 $users]

0 Karma

robf
Path Finder

i dont think you understood the question... i don't want to specify how many users. it could be 3 , 300, 3333...

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio

We're excited to announce the general availability of Scheduled Export for Dashboard Studio. Starting in ...

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...