Splunk Search

Why is stats more efficient and better supported with MapReduce than transaction?

kj384g
New Member

I was told that stats is more efficent and better supported with MapReduce... is that true and if so why?

0 Karma

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

The two don't do the same thing.

stats usually does less, so it'll be faster than transaction which is doing more work. For example, transaction will build multi-value fields for you while stats only builds those fields you specify.

As for using MapReduce more efficiently, grouping events together with transaction requires knowing all the events in one place - the search head. stats has less complex features - e.g. no maxspan, maxpause, non-unique identifiers - that allow a lot of work to be done on the indexers.

To sum up, if stats does what you need then it'll be faster almost every time.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Devesh Logendran, Splunk, and the Singapore Cyber Conquest

At this year’s Splunk University, I had the privilege of chatting with Devesh Logendran, one of the winners in ...

There's No Place Like Chrome and the Splunk Platform

WATCH NOW!Malware. Risky Extensions. Data Exfiltration. End-users are increasingly reliant on browsers to ...

Customer Experience | Join the Customer Advisory Board!

Are you ready to take your Splunk journey to the next level? 🚀 We invite you to join our elite squad ...