Splunk Search

Why is a function as 3-rd arg in the "replace" function not evaluating capturing groups?

philbond
Observer

Hi all,

Due to utf16/8-mismatch, I find a lot of utf16 \xnn chars in my events; this makes the json-parser  kind of losing it.

So I want to get the right utf8 chars out of a dictionary json-table by doing:

f=replace(_raw,"\\\\x([0-9a-fA-F]{2})",json_extract(utfx,"{}.\1"))

The dictionary simply looks like [{"00":"utf8char-1"}, ..., {"AE":"é"},...]

But this doesn't seem to work, the event even gets nilled completely.

Something explicit like this does seem to work though: (here for instance, all utf16 \xAE chars get replaced by the "é" char:
f=replace(_raw,"\\\\x([0-9a-fA-F]{2})",json_extract(utfx,"{}.9E"))

or this:

f=replace(_raw,"\\\\x([0-9a-fA-F]{2})","\1")), which simply removes the "\x"

...so is it like the capt.groups of the regex in replace() is not evaluated if it is arg to another function io a plain string?

Tx.

Labels (1)
0 Karma

philbond
Observer

..bump..

Anybody??

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

.conf24 | Registration Open!

Hello, hello! I come bearing good news: Registration for .conf24 is now open!   conf is Splunk’s rad annual ...

ICYMI - Check out the latest releases of Splunk Edge Processor

Splunk is pleased to announce the latest enhancements to Splunk Edge Processor.  HEC Receiver authorization ...

Introducing the 2024 SplunkTrust!

Hello, Splunk Community! We are beyond thrilled to announce our newest group of SplunkTrust members!  The ...