Splunk Search

Need help with a query

satyaallaparthi
Communicator

 

How can I match the IPs from csv file with the CIDR ranges in another csv? If no CIDR matches, I want to return "NoMatch" and if proper IP and CIDR match then return the CIDR 

I tried the approach below, but I keep getting "No Match" for all entries, even though I have proper CIDR ranges:

"| inputlookup IP_add.csv
| rename "IP Address" as ip
| appendcols
[| inputlookup cidr.csv]
| foreach cidr
[ eval match=if(cidrmatch('<<FIELD>>', ip), cidr, "No Match")]"

Note: I can't use join as I don't have IP field or ips in the cidr csv

any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you 🙂

 

Labels (2)
0 Karma

PickleRick
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Adding to already provided answer, your idea wouldn't work because appendcols adds fields from the appended dataset to the original results row-by-row (in a as-is order). So in your case a first row from the second lookup would "extend" first row of contents of the first lookup, second row would be glued to second row and so on.

Also your "foreach cidr", since you're only specifying a single field would yield the exactly same results as if you simply wrote your eval using "cidr" instead of "<<FIELD>>". And since most probably your cidr and ip fields didn't happen to "join" so that they landed in matching rows, your result was always a no-match.

I suppose you wanted to add a transposed contents of the second lookup to each result of your initial inputlookup search but it doesn't work that way.

0 Karma

yuanliu
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

As @JohnEGones suggested, cidrmatch is not the answer.  Set MATCH_TYPE(cidr) in cidr.csv following that document, then use lookup command.

| inputlookup IP_add.csv
| rename "IP Address" as ip
| lookup cidr.csv cidr as ip output cidr
| eval match=if(isnull(cidr), "No Match", cidr)

 

0 Karma

satyaallaparthi
Communicator

that solution will work when we have a common field in both, but that's the case here

0 Karma

yuanliu
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

that solution will work when we have a common field in both, but that's the case here

What do you mean?  You don't need "common" field, if by that you mean identical entries.  Consider these two:

IP_add.csv

ip
10.110.1.152
10.16.8.11
10.16.8.240

cidr.csv

cidr
10.16.8.0/24

If cidr.csv is set up with MATCH_TYPE(cidr), the above search will give you

cidripmatch
 10.110.1.152"No Match"
10.16.8.0/2410.16.8.1110.16.8.0/24
10.16.8.0/2410.16.8.24010.16.8.0/24

Have you tried?

JohnEGones
Communicator
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Character substitutions with Regular Expressions

This challenge was first posted on Slack #puzzles channelFor BORE at .conf23, we had a puzzle question which ...

Splunk Community Badges!

  Hey everyone! Ready to earn some serious bragging rights in the community? Along with our existing badges ...

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Matching cron expressions

This puzzle (first published here) is based on matching timestamps to cron expressions.All the timestamps ...