Hello,
This is my input.conf on the iis server:
[monitor://D:\IISLogs\W3SVC2]
index=iis_db
sourcetype=iis
However, this is my search result returns ii-2 instead of iis.
Is there a reason why the sourcetype in my search result is iis-2 instead of iis?
There are no changes to the index or sourcetype in transform.conf or props.conf.
IIS is a built-in sourcetype for Splunk. But IIS is not a simple sourcetype - it has many variants. So I often see that Splunk will assign a suffix to iis. You can expect to see iis-2, iis-3, etc. etc.
In Splunk 6, there are new ways to deal with IIS inputs. You might want to take a look at this blog entry:
Hi somesoni2, in props.conf, there are no changes being made to the sourcetype.
IIS is a built-in sourcetype for Splunk. But IIS is not a simple sourcetype - it has many variants. So I often see that Splunk will assign a suffix to iis. You can expect to see iis-2, iis-3, etc. etc.
In Splunk 6, there are new ways to deal with IIS inputs. You might want to take a look at this blog entry:
Okay will try this out. Thanks again Iguinin.
You can. You could also use a sourcetype alias, which might be easier.
http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.1/Data/Renamesourcetypes
The docs link talks about how to do this by editing the config file, but it is really easy to do from the UI. As a Splunk admin, go to Manager -> Fields -> Sourcetype renaming
Use this to rename the iis-2 sourcetype to plain iis. You only need to do this once for each of the weird names that Splunk assigns...
The other nice thing about sourcetype renaming is that you don't have to re-index any data.
I see. So in that case if I don't want it to be index this way, I should change the sourcetype to something else so that I can filter based on what I want?
Yes, although you obviously don't get the cool new ways to deal with the inputs. 😞
Hi lguinn. Thanks for the reply. Is the assigning of suffix to iis happening for versions below 6? I am currently using 4.3.3.
can you provide your sourcetype definition from props.conf as well?