I am making soap calls for google adwords api and it works in local but it gives error in server. Appdynamics running my server. When i made soap call in server gives me this error:
Unmarshalling Error: unexpected element (uri:"urn:appdynamics", local:"singularityheader"). Expected elements are <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}ApiExceptionFault>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}RequestHeader>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}ResponseHeader>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}get>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}getResponse>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}mutate>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}mutateLabel>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}mutateLabelResponse >,<{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}mutateResponse>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}query>, <{https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201806}queryResponse>
Thanks
Hi Necdet,
The error is because appdynamics adds a special singularity header on all soap calls to make correlation between appdynamics monitored application. Since, in this case of google adward service we don't need to correlete, you can create a custom backend rule from the controller UI to turn off this singularity header for this particular call.
Let me know if you need any help in doing the same.
Here is a document for reference - https://docs.appdynamics.com/display/PRO45/Backend+Detection+Rules
Thanks
Abhimanyu
Hi Necdet,
The error is because appdynamics adds a special singularity header on all soap calls to make correlation between appdynamics monitored application. Since, in this case of google adward service we don't need to correlete, you can create a custom backend rule from the controller UI to turn off this singularity header for this particular call.
Let me know if you need any help in doing the same.
Here is a document for reference - https://docs.appdynamics.com/display/PRO45/Backend+Detection+Rules
Thanks
Abhimanyu