- Splunk Answers
- :
- Splunk Administration
- :
- Knowledge Management
- :
- Re: Why don't I see match_type in Lookup Definitio...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark Topic
- Subscribe to Topic
- Mute Topic
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Why don't I see match_type in Lookup Definition Advanced options
I'm running Splunk 6.5. I see Min Matches, Max Matches, and Default Matches. I would like to define a lookup table that uses CIDR ranges. Is this a permissions issue, a version issue, or a configuration issue? I've see screen shots that suggest their should be match_type field in advanced options. I don't have access to modify transforms.conf directly.
Thanks.
pk
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I am pretty sure they enabled CIDR (match_type) option in recent versions (7.0+ versions) of splunk. We cannot apply CIDR (match_type) in 6.5 version through UI in Advanced options.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
So the only way to do this in versions prior to 7 is to manually edit that transform.conf file? Is a match_type of CIDR supported in 6.5 and just not available via the UI or is the feature absent altogether?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Typically yes!!! Editing the transforms.conf file is the only option.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks so much for the info. At least I know where I stand. I have also found through a little experimenting in the UI that the match_type parameter is not preserved when I clone a definition where it is set. That seems like a bug to me...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
What role do you have (for the user you're logging in as)?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Power User
Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio
Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud
More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!
