Knowledge Management

Why am I having Issues with use of LIKE in macro validation?

Pat
Path Finder

So I have a macro that has a field variable that I want to use a wildcard and worse the field names tend to have dots.  So a good field would be body.system.diskio.write.bytes and I tried using the following:

LIKE($field$, "body_system_diskio%")

with the idea is if would error if the field did not at least contain body.system.diskio.  I put the underscores in as im not sure it could handle the dots.  This does not work for me.  Anyone know what im doing wrong here?

 

EDITED :  I only had two options for conditionals and ended up getting it to work with match($BodySystemDiskIoBytes$, "body.system.diskio.write.bytes|body.system.diskio.read.bytes")

Labels (1)
Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

Pat
Path Finder

I got this solved by switching to the match  conditional

View solution in original post

0 Karma

bowesmana
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Your macro should have single quotes around $field$ so that if your field name has non standard characters (e.g. dots), then it will work, so like this

LIKE('$field$', "body_system_diskio%")
0 Karma

Pat
Path Finder

I got this solved by switching to the match  conditional

0 Karma

Pat
Path Finder

thanks.  This helped somewhat in that it does not fail but now it never fails.  I tried taking it one step further and tried LIKE('$BodySystemDiskIoBytes$', "'body.system.diskio'%") but no luck.  My failure field im using is "body.system.test.write.bytes"

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio

We're excited to announce the general availability of Scheduled Export for Dashboard Studio. Starting in ...

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...