Knowledge Management

Datamodel size on disk doesn't make sense?

TheBravoSierra
Path Finder

My Web Datamodel was set to 3 months with 67 GB+ size on disk. I reduced the summary range to 1 month, and size on disk increased to 100 GB+ size on disk. This doesn't make sense, can someone help explain? I would've thought less time range equated to less size on disk. 

Labels (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @TheBravoSierra,

I suppose that you rebuilded the DataModel after time reduction.

If no, rebuild it and the disk occupation should be less, if you already did, opena a case to Splunk Support because there isn't any reason for this behaviour.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

View solution in original post

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @TheBravoSierra,

I suppose that you rebuilded the DataModel after time reduction.

If no, rebuild it and the disk occupation should be less, if you already did, opena a case to Splunk Support because there isn't any reason for this behaviour.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Enterprise Security Content Update (ESCU) | New Releases

In December, the Splunk Threat Research Team had 1 release of new security content via the Enterprise Security ...

Why am I not seeing the finding in Splunk Enterprise Security Analyst Queue?

(This is the first of a series of 2 blogs). Splunk Enterprise Security is a fantastic tool that offers robust ...

Index This | What are the 12 Days of Splunk-mas?

December 2024 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with another ...