Hello All,
I am setting up a multisite indexer cluster with cluster manager redundancy,
I am setting up 2 clustermanager (site1 and site2)
Below is the config e.g.
[clustering]
mode = manager
manager_switchover_mode = auto
manager_uri = clustermanager:cm1,clustermanager:cm2
pass4SymmKey = changeme
[clustermanager:cm1]
manager_uri = https://10.16.88.3:8089
[clustermanager:cm2]
manager_uri = https://10.16.88.4:8089
My question is, I have 2 indexers on each site, should I give the manager_uri in the peer (indexer) of site1 to point to cm1 and manager_uri in the peer (indexer) of site2 to point to cm2. or all should point to the same indexer?
indexer 1 / indexer 2 -
manager_uri = https://10.16.88.3:8089
indexer 3 / indexer 4 -
manager_uri = https://10.16.88.4:8089
Also in the SearhHeads what should I define for the manager_uri? please advice.
Thanks,
Dhana
Hi @dhana22 ,
in the multisite Indexer Cluster architecture, there's only one Cluster Manager not two, if you have two Cluster Manager you have two clusters.
You can eventually have, in the secondary site, a turned off copy of the Cluster Manager but anyway the active CM is only one.
For more infos see at https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.1.1/Indexer/Basicclusterarchitecture
Ciao.
Giuseppe
Hi
Since 9.x there have been a feature "redundancy cluster master" https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Indexer/CMredundancy.
That doc's and what @gcusello pointed here don't said that this didn't work also for multisite clusters! Actually the first doc said that his can do also with multisite cluster. There are some new issues which you must take care of e.g. LB configuration, but this should be doable. There seems to be some differences between those docs and https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Indexer/Managersitefailure, so doc feed back is needed (sent).
r. Ismo
When doing a high-availability with multiple cluster managers (CM), you should have a load balancer (LB) in front of them. The manager_ui configuration then points to the LB - not an individual CM. The CM's will keep their bundles in sync, and the LB will help ensure that your indexers always reach a "good" one that is up.
Here's the docs that explain how to put an LB in front of the CMs in this scenario.
Thanks a lot, will try to configure with the LB and test it out, so the forwarders also will be sending data to the LB URL?
Dhana