Splunk Search

How do I interpret these Bonnie++ results?

keithyap
Path Finder

Hi All,

I have read a few threads in the Answers forum and in a number of them, it states that Random Seeks == IOPS.
So with the results below, the IOPS would be over 100k?

Also, there are 2 columns at then end of the table with the values 530, 593, 319, and 723... Any idea what these values are?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated Thanks!

alt text

Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

keithyap
Path Finder

I just realized that due to the (Non Peak), it added the name into chunk size and Per char cells. causing the data to be wrong.
After running the results again without the brackets the results were correct.

alt text

So now the random seeks look more realistic with 300+ IOPS instead of 100+K

View solution in original post

keithyap
Path Finder

I just realized that due to the (Non Peak), it added the name into chunk size and Per char cells. causing the data to be wrong.
After running the results again without the brackets the results were correct.

alt text

So now the random seeks look more realistic with 300+ IOPS instead of 100+K

sdvorak_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

What is the command that you ran? That is a slightly different output than I am used to seeing. Also what version of bonnie++ are you running?

0 Karma

keithyap
Path Finder

1.03, I did a | bon_csv2html > results.html after the bonnie++ command
bonnie++ -s 262144 -u root:root -qfb | bon_csv2html > results.html

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

.conf24 | Registration Open!

Hello, hello! I come bearing good news: Registration for .conf24 is now open!   conf is Splunk’s rad annual ...

ICYMI - Check out the latest releases of Splunk Edge Processor

Splunk is pleased to announce the latest enhancements to Splunk Edge Processor.  HEC Receiver authorization ...

Introducing the 2024 SplunkTrust!

Hello, Splunk Community! We are beyond thrilled to announce our newest group of SplunkTrust members!  The ...