All Apps and Add-ons

Blue Coat ProxySG App for Splunk: Can I get data in a local file instead of TCP streaming?

banderson7
Communicator

I already have proxy logs on my forwarder in the form of forwarded syslogs, but the directions in the app say to set up a TCP receiving input. Can I change this to use my local logs instead?

0 Karma
1 Solution

joel_ebrahimi
Explorer

You can import the data anyway that you look, you just want to set the sourcetype too bluecoat:proxysg:. Where anything can be substituted for how you want to identify the log.

So for the customclient the sourcetype is bluecoat:proxysg:customclient , but in your case you could use bluecoat:proxysg:locallog if you wanted to keep track of the origin.

View solution in original post

joel_ebrahimi
Explorer

You can import the data anyway that you look, you just want to set the sourcetype too bluecoat:proxysg:. Where anything can be substituted for how you want to identify the log.

So for the customclient the sourcetype is bluecoat:proxysg:customclient , but in your case you could use bluecoat:proxysg:locallog if you wanted to keep track of the origin.

mreynov_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

You may have to adjust sourcetype naming, but otherwise should not be a problem.
Look in the dashboards of the app for the sourcetype it is expecting and do a [sourcetype] rename in the local/props.conf for the app.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Observability | How to Think About Instrumentation Overhead (White Paper)

Novice observability practitioners are often overly obsessed with performance. They might approach ...

Cloud Platform | Get Resiliency in the Cloud Event (Register Now!)

IDC Report: Enterprises Gain Higher Efficiency and Resiliency With Migration to Cloud  Today many enterprises ...

The Great Resilience Quest: 10th Leaderboard Update

The tenth leaderboard update (11.23-12.05) for The Great Resilience Quest is out >> As our brave ...