<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Field extraction on post multikv field? in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11897#M862</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, to clarify, it will do almost just as you've set up above (though you're missing a field name for the extraction), it just can't be set up as an automatic extraction.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-21T07:22:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Field extraction on post multikv field?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11895#M860</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create a field extraction on a field that only exists after piping through multikv?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In other words, can I persist this: &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index="os" sourcetype="netstat" | multikv | rex field=LocalAddress "(?&amp;lt;port&amp;gt;\d{5})$"
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11895#M860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon_Shelston</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T04:20:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Field extraction on post multikv field?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11896#M861</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, Splunk will not extract fields that are only present post multikv. This extraction will need to be based on the _raw field.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:29:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11896#M861</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon_Shelston</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T06:29:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Field extraction on post multikv field?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11897#M862</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, to clarify, it will do almost just as you've set up above (though you're missing a field name for the extraction), it just can't be set up as an automatic extraction.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11897#M862</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T07:22:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Field extraction on post multikv field?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11898#M863</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;okay, i just edited it and saw the tag was htmlized away. so that should work as is. just can't make it auto whatever.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Field-extraction-on-post-multikv-field/m-p/11898#M863</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T09:39:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

