<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number? in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165087#M46890</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct, that is the maximum limit.   But if you share your data and your goal, it is highly likely that we can come up with a solution that does not use &lt;CODE&gt;subsearches&lt;/CODE&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:59:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-16T18:59:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165086#M46889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Using an append command, it seems I can successfully set the maxout to a number less than 50000, but not increase it to anything higher?&lt;BR /&gt;
e.g. if maxout=50001 I get only 50000 results&lt;BR /&gt;
Is this observation correct? If so is there any way to override with a larger number?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165086#M46889</guid>
      <dc:creator>paddygriffin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-16T17:48:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165087#M46890</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct, that is the maximum limit.   But if you share your data and your goal, it is highly likely that we can come up with a solution that does not use &lt;CODE&gt;subsearches&lt;/CODE&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:59:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165087#M46890</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-16T18:59:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165088#M46891</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks - I see the entry in limits.conf which can be increased but I'm not anxious to do that as you can imagine.&lt;BR /&gt;
Here's a summary of the use case below. I'm exploring several different approaches - subsearches, lookups using outputlookup, intermediate .csv files using outputcsv, transactions, joins... it seems like a simple scenario and is actually quite malleable, however several of the approaches run out of steam on scalability as the number of events gets large, others on performance...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Scenario: Splunk query to determine whether a new transaction which is performed by a company in the past hour has any historical record.&lt;BR /&gt;
A transaction is deemed to have historical record if there is a similar transaction performed by the &lt;STRONG&gt;same company in past 90 days having the **same beneficiary name OR beneficiary account number&lt;/STRONG&gt;**&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 19:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165088#M46891</guid>
      <dc:creator>paddygriffin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-16T19:52:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165089#M46892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Given your description, this should work (when run over "last hour")&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;... | dedup beneficiaryName beneficiaryAccountNumber | map search="search earliest=-90d@d latest=-60m beneficiaryName=$beneficiaryName$ OR beneficiaryAccountNumber=$beneficiaryAccountNumber$"
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165089#M46892</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-16T20:27:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165090#M46893</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nice, thank you. Beautifully simple and elegant. Only concern is scalability/ performance as the map search runs once per input and that can be a very large number. Something to test &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165090#M46893</guid>
      <dc:creator>paddygriffin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-16T21:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165091#M46894</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It will scale without breaking (which was your problem) but it is slow and will get slower but that's a good tradeoff for not breaking down completely.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:49:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165091#M46894</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-16T21:49:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165092#M46895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interestingly, there seems to be some limiter on number of results but I can't find any entry in limits.conf to explain it.&lt;BR /&gt;
In my lab environment, it behaves fine until I exceed 60000 results, once I exceed that it returns only the first 50000 results. Up to that point performance seems linear, execution time increasing with the number of results as expected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 03:01:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165092#M46895</guid>
      <dc:creator>paddygriffin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-17T03:01:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165093#M46896</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK, I have another way; try this (run for last 90 days):&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;... | addinfo | eval type = ((info_search_time = _time) &amp;lt;= 3600), "LAST_HOUR", "LAST_90_DAYS") | fillnull beneficiaryName beneficiaryAccountNumber | stats values(type) AS Types dc(type) AS NumTypes by beneficiaryName beneficiaryAccountNumber | eval RecordHistory=if((NumTypes==2), "YES", "NO")&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165093#M46896</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-28T20:18:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the append command's default maxout=50000 also the maximum limit, or can I override this with a larger number?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165094#M46897</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can add &lt;CODE&gt;max_searches=9999&lt;/CODE&gt; or similar to the &lt;CODE&gt;map&lt;/CODE&gt; command, otherwise it defaults to &lt;CODE&gt;10&lt;/CODE&gt;, I think.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 14:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-the-append-command-s-default-maxout-50000-also-the-maximum/m-p/165094#M46897</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-11T14:21:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

