<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: False group by time (microseconds range!) in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/False-group-by-time-microseconds-range/m-p/131659#M35923</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Couple of points in your question, so let's go through them one by one.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You can submit bug reports without having Enterprise Support. Go to splunk.com -&amp;gt; Support -&amp;gt; Support Portal, that should be open for everyone.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You did manage to upload the picture directly here? I can see it.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As for your query, please run this:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;sourcetype=blablabla| stats min(UTC) max(UTC) count by _time | eval time = strftime(_time, "%+")
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Splunk formats the &lt;CODE&gt;_time&lt;/CODE&gt; field in tables with second precision by default, I'm predicting that each row will have a different millisecond value... probably 0 for the &lt;CODE&gt;count=18&lt;/CODE&gt; one, and 332, 513, 659 for the other rows.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Maybe there's a problem with the timestamp recognition for some events? Do post the anonymized events that fall within that second along with the recognized &lt;CODE&gt;_time&lt;/CODE&gt; value and the props.conf settings for that sourcetype.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-06T11:07:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>False group by time (microseconds range!)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/False-group-by-time-microseconds-range/m-p/131658#M35922</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I wanted to take a look at some data with splunk, as I was suddenly very surprised by its form. splunks showed me some maximum points, where he found a lot more events than in the average. The problem: When I took a look at it with an other query to see the time-ranges of each group I found something very interesting. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Splunk seems to group some events outside of the other ranges! - And I couldn't understand WHY?&lt;BR /&gt;
thats my Query:&lt;BR /&gt;
sourcetype=blablabla| stats min(UTC) max(UTC) count by _time&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately the result is the following:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;IMG src="http://s30.postimg.org/qwun98i3l/Splunk_Events.jpg" alt="False Splunk group by" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I really would have liked you to upload the picture directly here. But the website said, that only PNG or JPG Files are allowed... And guess what: It didn't accepted my Windows Snipping tool result: Neither as PNG or JPG.&lt;BR /&gt;
Meanwhile I reached a point where I can only say: Sorry Splunk. But such bugs REALLY sucks and are not worth the huge amount of money, we'll have to pay!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I hope that someone has an explanation and especially that the Splunk Team, which should be reading here, responds if possible, otherwise its very unlikely to recommend it for the company I am evaluating Splunk for. Especially because its not possible to report a bug now without using the Enterprise support... &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Xantor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 08:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/False-group-by-time-microseconds-range/m-p/131658#M35922</guid>
      <dc:creator>splunkbeginner2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-06T08:03:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: False group by time (microseconds range!)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/False-group-by-time-microseconds-range/m-p/131659#M35923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Couple of points in your question, so let's go through them one by one.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You can submit bug reports without having Enterprise Support. Go to splunk.com -&amp;gt; Support -&amp;gt; Support Portal, that should be open for everyone.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You did manage to upload the picture directly here? I can see it.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As for your query, please run this:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;sourcetype=blablabla| stats min(UTC) max(UTC) count by _time | eval time = strftime(_time, "%+")
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Splunk formats the &lt;CODE&gt;_time&lt;/CODE&gt; field in tables with second precision by default, I'm predicting that each row will have a different millisecond value... probably 0 for the &lt;CODE&gt;count=18&lt;/CODE&gt; one, and 332, 513, 659 for the other rows.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Maybe there's a problem with the timestamp recognition for some events? Do post the anonymized events that fall within that second along with the recognized &lt;CODE&gt;_time&lt;/CODE&gt; value and the props.conf settings for that sourcetype.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/False-group-by-time-microseconds-range/m-p/131659#M35923</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-06T11:07:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: False group by time (microseconds range!)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/False-group-by-time-microseconds-range/m-p/131660#M35924</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Martin, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;thanks. that type of support worked. when I tried to report a bug directly from splunk I just got the message, that the support portal is offline and I can use the enterprise support. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Yes you can view the picture, because it was hosted external on an other website. Otherwise it wasn't possible, but I reported it now. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'll try to run the query as soon as I get home.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 16:59:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/False-group-by-time-microseconds-range/m-p/131660#M35924</guid>
      <dc:creator>splunkbeginner2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-07T16:59:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

