<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is there a more efficient method than using join to combine searches? in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-there-a-more-efficient-method-than-using-join-to-combine/m-p/130220#M35466</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I was just wondering what more efficient methods there are when combining searches than using | join. I always hear everyone telling me that joins are a last resort because they aren't the most efficient way to combine searches. Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bigrichie90</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-18T13:15:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there a more efficient method than using join to combine searches?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-there-a-more-efficient-method-than-using-join-to-combine/m-p/130220#M35466</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was just wondering what more efficient methods there are when combining searches than using | join. I always hear everyone telling me that joins are a last resort because they aren't the most efficient way to combine searches. Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-there-a-more-efficient-method-than-using-join-to-combine/m-p/130220#M35466</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigrichie90</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-18T13:15:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a more efficient method than using join to combine searches?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-there-a-more-efficient-method-than-using-join-to-combine/m-p/130221#M35467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi bigrichie90,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;have a look at this answer &lt;A href="http://answers.splunk.com/answers/129424/how-to-compare-fields-over-multiple-sourcetypes-without-join-append-or-use-of-subsearches.html"&gt;http://answers.splunk.com/answers/129424/how-to-compare-fields-over-multiple-sourcetypes-without-join-append-or-use-of-subsearches.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;cheers, MuS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:17:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-there-a-more-efficient-method-than-using-join-to-combine/m-p/130221#M35467</guid>
      <dc:creator>MuS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-18T13:17:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a more efficient method than using join to combine searches?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-there-a-more-efficient-method-than-using-join-to-combine/m-p/130222#M35468</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@piebob recently had me start sending out weekly featured Answers posts internally to certain teams in Splunk. Your post on alternatives to join, append and subsearches was in the first set I featured ;D&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 01:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Is-there-a-more-efficient-method-than-using-join-to-combine/m-p/130222#M35468</guid>
      <dc:creator>ppablo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-24T01:37:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

