<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122724#M33096</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Defining two groups would indeed clone data to both indexers. To get load balancing, add two servers to one group like this:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcpout]
defaultGroup = productionSplunk

[tcpout:productionSplunk]
server = X.X.X.X:9997, Y.Y.Y.Y:9997
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-07T20:46:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122720#M33092</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As a quick check can some one suggest me if we have a 2 indexer envirornment with 2 search heads - does it make sense for all universal forwarders to send events to both indexers?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Question i am asking is i am looking to improve performance at my dashboards run from search head and if we are sending same data to both indexers how does it help performance? ( i know it helps from load balancing and DR prospective but not how it helps in seek time/performance)?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Anyone?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:55:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122720#M33092</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilmehra79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T17:55:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122721#M33093</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Usually you'll want to have each UF send to both indexers in a load-balanced fashion, so they switch between one and the other. That way almost every search can pull data from both indexers and you get decent performance.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't see how cloning the data to both indexers would help performance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 19:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122721#M33093</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T19:39:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122722#M33094</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;when you say load balnced way you mean output.conf has ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout] &lt;BR /&gt;
defaultGroup = productionSplunk1, productionSplunk2&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk1] &lt;BR /&gt;
server = X.X.X.X:9997&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk2] &lt;BR /&gt;
server = Y.Y.Y.Y:9997&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:36:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122722#M33094</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilmehra79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T20:36:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122723#M33095</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;that would send everything to both, use autolb=true or use a DNS load balancer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122723#M33095</guid>
      <dc:creator>linu1988</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T20:44:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122724#M33096</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Defining two groups would indeed clone data to both indexers. To get load balancing, add two servers to one group like this:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcpout]
defaultGroup = productionSplunk

[tcpout:productionSplunk]
server = X.X.X.X:9997, Y.Y.Y.Y:9997
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122724#M33096</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T20:46:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122725#M33097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks so does either of the two configs will be ok?&lt;BR /&gt;
Option 1 &lt;BR /&gt;
[tcpout]&lt;BR /&gt;
defaultGroup = productionSplunk&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk]&lt;BR /&gt;
server = X.X.X.X:9997, Y.Y.Y.Y:9997&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Option 2 &lt;BR /&gt;
autolb=true&lt;BR /&gt;
[tcpout] defaultGroup = productionSplunk1, productionSplunk2&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk1] server = X.X.X.X:9997&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk2] server = Y.Y.Y.Y:9997&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:18:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122725#M33097</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilmehra79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T21:18:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122726#M33098</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;They do entirely different things, so which one is okay for you depends on what you want.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122726#M33098</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T21:21:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122727#M33099</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk]&lt;BR /&gt;
server = X.X.X.X:9997, Y.Y.Y.Y:9997&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
will not this clone data as well?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;i thought only the below would send load balanced&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk]&lt;BR /&gt;
server = X.X.X.X:9997, Y.Y.Y.Y:9997&lt;BR /&gt;
autoLB=True&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcpout:productionSplunk]&lt;BR /&gt;
server = some.splunk.com:9997&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;load balancer handles the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122727#M33099</guid>
      <dc:creator>linu1988</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T21:28:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122728#M33100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you please explain or refer me to doc -&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Isn't in both cases UF sent data to one indexer but other indexer recieve it from its first peer at port 8080?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:30:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122728#M33100</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilmehra79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T21:30:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122729#M33101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@linu1988: That will load-balance rather than clone - note, &lt;CODE&gt;autoLB=true&lt;/CODE&gt; is the default.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;@nikhilmehra79: &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.0.2/Admin/outputsconf"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.0.2/Admin/outputsconf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you're talking about one indexer receiving data from the other, that's clustering - are you using clustering?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:33:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122729#M33101</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T21:33:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122730#M33102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok i think i was not clear with my requirements:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to send data in Load Blanced method (round Robin) to one indexer at a time&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;But data should synch between two indexers (by peer clustering at port 8080 default). First - am i doing something crazy?, all i am thinking to use efficiently networks and also not give up on a DR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Will following load balance and send one event to one indexer only on network, and since both indexers are cluster peers will ultimately both indexers have same set of events?&lt;BR /&gt;
[tcpout:productionSplunk] server = X.X.X.X:9997, Y.Y.Y.Y:9997&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122730#M33102</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilmehra79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T21:52:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122731#M33103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If both indexers are peers in the same cluster and your replication factor is 2 then yes, both peers will store each event even if your forwarders only send it to one using load balancing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122731#M33103</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T21:55:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Distribution of Load and Splunk Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122732#M33104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes both peers are in same cluster controlled by same master node and i have a replication factor 2. Thanks for explanations guys.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 22:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Distribution-of-Load-and-Splunk-Performance/m-p/122732#M33104</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilmehra79</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T22:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

