<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic fileSizeGB AND fileCount thresholds in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/fileSizeGB-AND-fileCount-thresholds/m-p/697755#M237003</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Wondering if there are any industry best practices and/or recommendation for&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;setting fileSizeGB AND fileCount thresholds when searching\detecting&amp;nbsp; data exfiltration over USB device with the help of Proofpoint ITM events in Splunk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know we all have diff levels of risk&amp;nbsp; as we try to limit the number of false positives to our SOC team.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;We started out with&amp;nbsp;eval fileSizeGB=(Total/1000000) | where fileSizeGB &amp;gt; 100 AND fileCount &amp;gt; 100.&amp;nbsp; These thresholds are yielding few detections\alerts so we know we need to lower.&amp;nbsp; You can prob guess any insider threat team would want fileSizeGB &amp;gt; 10 AND fileCount &amp;gt; 1.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Just trying to find happy medium for all&amp;nbsp;so any best practices or suggestions appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:29:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DDowns</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-29T19:29:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>fileSizeGB AND fileCount thresholds</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/fileSizeGB-AND-fileCount-thresholds/m-p/697755#M237003</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wondering if there are any industry best practices and/or recommendation for&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;setting fileSizeGB AND fileCount thresholds when searching\detecting&amp;nbsp; data exfiltration over USB device with the help of Proofpoint ITM events in Splunk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know we all have diff levels of risk&amp;nbsp; as we try to limit the number of false positives to our SOC team.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;We started out with&amp;nbsp;eval fileSizeGB=(Total/1000000) | where fileSizeGB &amp;gt; 100 AND fileCount &amp;gt; 100.&amp;nbsp; These thresholds are yielding few detections\alerts so we know we need to lower.&amp;nbsp; You can prob guess any insider threat team would want fileSizeGB &amp;gt; 10 AND fileCount &amp;gt; 1.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Just trying to find happy medium for all&amp;nbsp;so any best practices or suggestions appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:29:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/fileSizeGB-AND-fileCount-thresholds/m-p/697755#M237003</guid>
      <dc:creator>DDowns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-29T19:29:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fileSizeGB AND fileCount thresholds</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/fileSizeGB-AND-fileCount-thresholds/m-p/697758#M237005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. Other than the fact that you're holding the events in Splunk the question as such is completely unrelated to Splunk. It's a question about ObserveIT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. There is no general one-size-fits-all answer. Different organizations have different sensitivity to those things&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:54:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/fileSizeGB-AND-fileCount-thresholds/m-p/697758#M237005</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-29T19:54:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

