<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Will inputs.conf tcp input stanza accept CIDR notation or REGEX? (forwarder version 4.3.6) in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91608#M23615</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you're going to have to go with a stanza per host that you're expecting traffic from.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 02:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mloven_splunk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-12T02:28:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Will inputs.conf tcp input stanza accept CIDR notation or REGEX? (forwarder version 4.3.6)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91605#M23612</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a need to accept data from multiple servers.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;WIll something like this work?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcp://192.168.1.0\/24:9999]
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If not, would specifying multiple stanza that listen on the same port number work?  For example:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcp://192.168.1.1:9999]
[tcp://192.168.1.2:9999]
[tcp://192.168.1.3:9999]
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:13:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91605#M23612</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_wolverine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-10T23:13:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will inputs.conf tcp input stanza accept CIDR notation or REGEX? (forwarder version 4.3.6)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91606#M23613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the_wolverine,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I don't think Splunk will accept CIDR notation (or a wildcard) in a tcp input stanza.  The second option you listed should work though.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Also, if you don't expect any other traffic on port 9999, you can also just do:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[tcp//:9999]
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;which will accept data from any host on port 9999.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91606#M23613</guid>
      <dc:creator>mloven_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-11T01:41:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will inputs.conf tcp input stanza accept CIDR notation or REGEX? (forwarder version 4.3.6)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91607#M23614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We currently use this accept all on port 9999 and have gotten some junk (perhaps scanning).  That's why we need to lock it down.  In 5.0x the capability to configure is better.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91607#M23614</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_wolverine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-11T21:59:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will inputs.conf tcp input stanza accept CIDR notation or REGEX? (forwarder version 4.3.6)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91608#M23615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you're going to have to go with a stanza per host that you're expecting traffic from.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 02:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91608#M23615</guid>
      <dc:creator>mloven_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-12T02:28:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will inputs.conf tcp input stanza accept CIDR notation or REGEX? (forwarder version 4.3.6)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91609#M23616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In version 5.0* and higher, there is an acceptFrom option which will allow/deny specific hosts/ips.  The solution is to upgrade to version 5.0x forwarder or newer to apply this configuration to the input.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 18:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Will-inputs-conf-tcp-input-stanza-accept-CIDR-notation-or-REGEX/m-p/91609#M23616</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_wolverine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-05T18:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

