<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Splunk Search results limit 4999 in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/667974#M229176</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, I am using the append command to combine two queries and tabulate the results, but I see only 4999 transactions. Is there any way I can get full results?&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 19:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kc_prane</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-08T19:59:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Splunk Search results limit 4999</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/667974#M229176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, I am using the append command to combine two queries and tabulate the results, but I see only 4999 transactions. Is there any way I can get full results?&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 19:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/667974#M229176</guid>
      <dc:creator>kc_prane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-08T19:59:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk Search results limit 4999</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/667988#M229187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;append and subsearches have limitations and limits defined in limits.conf, so you cannot override these, but that number seems an odd number.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is your search - there are often alternatives to append and a subsearch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share your search&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 22:35:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/667988#M229187</guid>
      <dc:creator>bowesmana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-08T22:35:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk Search results limit 4999</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/668007#M229191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;@bowesman Thanks for the reply Please find the below snap shots for the query. I had masked my base search.. fyi&amp;nbsp; my base search is same for the subsearch as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kc_prane_0-1699495212563.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.splunk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28024i57301087A4096C7A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kc_prane_0-1699495212563.png" alt="kc_prane_0-1699495212563.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 02:00:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/668007#M229191</guid>
      <dc:creator>kc_prane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-09T02:00:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk Search results limit 4999</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/668015#M229195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/243022"&gt;@kc_prane&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;using a screenshot and masking your search we cannot help you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6367"&gt;@bowesmana&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;was saying that probably you don't need to use append and you can put both the searches in the main search, in this way you don't have any limit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 07:16:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/668015#M229195</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-09T07:16:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk Search results limit 4999</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/668176#M229218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK, so a lot going on here...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have two searches that look similar - not sure if they are searching the same data set, but in order to diagnose this you should do a number of things. You are also using the transaction command that also has limitations and can cause data not to appear if you hit those limitations - and you will not know about it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggest you validate first search 1 and see how many results you expect and then run search 2 (the appended data) and determine how many you see then.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do not see 1 + 2 in the combined search, you are hitting some memory issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect, but cannot say exactly, that you could remove both the append and the use of transaction and just use stats.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the two masked search data sets the same or different?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 23:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Splunk-Search-results-limit-4999/m-p/668176#M229218</guid>
      <dc:creator>bowesmana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-09T23:20:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

