<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PAN data in indexes. How to tackle them to avoid non-compliance? in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261171#M189689</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;see this&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.4.1/Data/Anonymizedata"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.4.1/Data/Anonymizedata&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Bye.&lt;BR /&gt;
Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-15T14:23:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PAN data in indexes. How to tackle them to avoid non-compliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261170#M189688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have Splunk system collecting data from various sources (network, OS, application logs etc).&lt;BR /&gt;
Unfortunately, some of these systems send PAN related data with unmasked credit card details, but we dont know where.&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there a way to tackle these? We need to track they are sending PAN related data, but don't want to store that data (or store in hashed format).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;My only thought is&lt;BR /&gt;
 - create an index  pci_secure_index  with permission only to restricted users&lt;BR /&gt;
 - Index all data normally. But run scheduled search to detect PAN information.  Collect these data and summary index to "pci_secure_index"&lt;BR /&gt;
 - Delete (delete) from the original index &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is there a better approach? &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;(PS: We tried the anonymise data approach to search for cc pattern in first 5000 characters, but the system almost went down to knees)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:14:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261170#M189688</guid>
      <dc:creator>koshyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T10:14:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN data in indexes. How to tackle them to avoid non-compliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261171#M189689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;see this&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.4.1/Data/Anonymizedata"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.4.1/Data/Anonymizedata&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Bye.&lt;BR /&gt;
Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261171#M189689</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-15T14:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN data in indexes. How to tackle them to avoid non-compliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261172#M189690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We tried the anonymise data approach to search for cc pattern in first 5000 characters, but the system almost went down to knees. The above link is good, if we are 100% sure or field where the PAN is coming. But incoming terrabytes of data with whole event scan is performance killer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261172#M189690</guid>
      <dc:creator>koshyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-15T14:43:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN data in indexes. How to tackle them to avoid non-compliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261173#M189691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If that's the case, deploy more indexers.  I don't see any other ways.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261173#M189691</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-15T21:09:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN data in indexes. How to tackle them to avoid non-compliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261174#M189692</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you don't need real time, you could pre parse data with a script, and after index them in Splunk.&lt;BR /&gt;
We did this for a customer that wanted to encrypt one field without lost it.&lt;BR /&gt;
Bye.&lt;BR /&gt;
Giuseppe &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 06:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/PAN-data-in-indexes-How-to-tackle-them-to-avoid-non-compliance/m-p/261174#M189692</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-16T06:05:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

