<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Learning to use anomalies? in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Learning-to-use-anomalies/m-p/104044#M183128</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you provide some examples of the searches you are performing or other specifics that might help us answer your question?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jtrucks</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-25T13:18:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Learning to use anomalies?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Learning-to-use-anomalies/m-p/104043#M183127</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The documentation has not been much help all I really want is to start learning how to use it. Every time I try to use one of the example searches (or at least a version specific to my logs) I get: "A separating field was not found. Carrying on without it" and no unexpectedness field is visible. Does anyone no how to fix this? Or alternatively, just a few searches good for familiarizing myself with the use of anomalies?    &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Here is the documentation just in case: &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/5.0.3/SearchReference/Anomalies"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/5.0.3/SearchReference/Anomalies&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Learning-to-use-anomalies/m-p/104043#M183127</guid>
      <dc:creator>passing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-23T15:41:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Learning to use anomalies?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Learning-to-use-anomalies/m-p/104044#M183128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you provide some examples of the searches you are performing or other specifics that might help us answer your question?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Learning-to-use-anomalies/m-p/104044#M183128</guid>
      <dc:creator>jtrucks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-25T13:18:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Learning to use anomalies?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Learning-to-use-anomalies/m-p/104045#M183129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you using "annomalies ... by field_name". Then the message tells you that there are some events without the field_name field I would guess.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 15:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Learning-to-use-anomalies/m-p/104045#M183129</guid>
      <dc:creator>fbl_itcs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-28T15:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

