<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Syntax that works in 6.1.1 (SPLUNK Enterprise) doesn't work in 6.4.2 (HUNK) in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Syntax-that-works-in-6-1-1-SPLUNK-Enterprise-doesn-t-work-in-6-4/m-p/226328#M176595</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This syntax ..&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;| stats sum(transmitted_MB) AS transmitted_total_MB, sum(received_MB) AS received_total_MB, count earliest(_time) AS et count latest(_time) AS lt BY username, src, url, http_method, http_user_agent, filter_category&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;works fine on our Live environment which is 6.1.1 SPLUNK enterprise.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We are upgrading and migrating to a 6.4.2 environment using HUNK to a HADOOP back end. The same syntax (literally cut and pasted over) throws the following error.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Error in 'stats' command: 1 duplicate rename field(s). Original renames: [transmitted_total_MB received_total_MB count et count lt]. Duplicate renames: [count].&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen something similar?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:15:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FrankBurns</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-29T11:15:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Syntax that works in 6.1.1 (SPLUNK Enterprise) doesn't work in 6.4.2 (HUNK)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Syntax-that-works-in-6-1-1-SPLUNK-Enterprise-doesn-t-work-in-6-4/m-p/226328#M176595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This syntax ..&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;| stats sum(transmitted_MB) AS transmitted_total_MB, sum(received_MB) AS received_total_MB, count earliest(_time) AS et count latest(_time) AS lt BY username, src, url, http_method, http_user_agent, filter_category&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;works fine on our Live environment which is 6.1.1 SPLUNK enterprise.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We are upgrading and migrating to a 6.4.2 environment using HUNK to a HADOOP back end. The same syntax (literally cut and pasted over) throws the following error.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Error in 'stats' command: 1 duplicate rename field(s). Original renames: [transmitted_total_MB received_total_MB count et count lt]. Duplicate renames: [count].&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen something similar?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:15:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Syntax-that-works-in-6-1-1-SPLUNK-Enterprise-doesn-t-work-in-6-4/m-p/226328#M176595</guid>
      <dc:creator>FrankBurns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T11:15:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syntax that works in 6.1.1 (SPLUNK Enterprise) doesn't work in 6.4.2 (HUNK)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Syntax-that-works-in-6-1-1-SPLUNK-Enterprise-doesn-t-work-in-6-4/m-p/226329#M176596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you validate if this works when you use Splunk 6.4.2 instead of Hunk 6.4.2?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:57:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Syntax-that-works-in-6-1-1-SPLUNK-Enterprise-doesn-t-work-in-6-4/m-p/226329#M176596</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdagan_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T15:57:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

