<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can I use the &amp;quot;IN&amp;quot; command like this? in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Can-I-use-the-quot-IN-quot-command-like-this/m-p/383353#M170435</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure what documentation you are referring to, but yes, since Splunk v6.6.0 you can also use it like that. See the documentation for the search command: &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/SearchReference/Search#Multiple_field-value_comparisons_with_the_IN_operator"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/SearchReference/Search#Multiple_field-value_comparisons_with_the_IN_operator&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FrankVl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:34:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can I use the "IN" command like this?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Can-I-use-the-quot-IN-quot-command-like-this/m-p/383352#M170434</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index=myIndex FieldA="A" AND LogonType IN (4,5,8,9,10,11,12)
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The documentation says it is used with "eval" or "where" and returns only the value "true". &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But it also seems to work as described above.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Now I'm unsure if this is "failsafe" as an initial search...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Can-I-use-the-quot-IN-quot-command-like-this/m-p/383352#M170434</guid>
      <dc:creator>twjack</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can I use the "IN" command like this?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Can-I-use-the-quot-IN-quot-command-like-this/m-p/383353#M170435</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure what documentation you are referring to, but yes, since Splunk v6.6.0 you can also use it like that. See the documentation for the search command: &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/SearchReference/Search#Multiple_field-value_comparisons_with_the_IN_operator"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/SearchReference/Search#Multiple_field-value_comparisons_with_the_IN_operator&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Can-I-use-the-quot-IN-quot-command-like-this/m-p/383353#M170435</guid>
      <dc:creator>FrankVl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T10:34:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can I use the "IN" command like this?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Can-I-use-the-quot-IN-quot-command-like-this/m-p/383354#M170436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Holy crap, I actually looked in the wrong documentation. I must have been blind. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Can-I-use-the-quot-IN-quot-command-like-this/m-p/383354#M170436</guid>
      <dc:creator>twjack</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T14:02:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

