<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67623#M16891</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The username field does not exist from the third index.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 23:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>castle1126</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-07T23:38:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67620#M16888</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have three indexes that I'm trying to build a transaction from.  the first two indexes each have a field named User_Name, which makes the transaction statement pretty easy.  This creates the base transaction I'm looking for.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The first index also has a field called ip.  What I want to do is use this field to retrieve the events from the third index into the first transaction (unfortunately the User_Name field does not exist in the third index).  I've tried so many different searches, all never result in a transaction containing all the pertinent records.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts on how to create this type of transaction?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67620#M16888</guid>
      <dc:creator>castle1126</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-25T09:36:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67621#M16889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What does your data look like? Is the username completely missing from the third index, or just not extracted into that field?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67621#M16889</guid>
      <dc:creator>southeringtonp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-25T20:36:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67622#M16890</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am also keen to see what the data looks like as mentioned by  southeringtonp. 
Have you thought about doing data enrichment using a lookup of some unique data and then using the new field to transact on.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67622#M16890</guid>
      <dc:creator>b4ggio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-07T22:00:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67623#M16891</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The username field does not exist from the third index.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 23:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67623#M16891</guid>
      <dc:creator>castle1126</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-07T23:38:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67624#M16892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What fields &lt;EM&gt;do&lt;/EM&gt; exists in the third index that might be used to unite those events with events from one of the first two indexes?  A subsearch or double-transaction might work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:12:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67624#M16892</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdwilkerson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-23T21:12:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67625#M16893</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Maybe this isn't the best place to ask this question but I'll try anyway.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can I transaction span multiple indexes and multiple sourcetypes?  It seems like it can but I thought I would ask to verify it.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Curt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67625#M16893</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtgran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-28T19:47:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67626#M16894</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Curtgan, Yes, this isn't the right place, you should really have started a new question.  But the answer to your question is, yes, transaction doesn't care so long as the time settings and field are right.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:22:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67626#M16894</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdwilkerson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-28T20:22:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a transaction from multiple, somewhat disparate, indexes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67627#M16895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does the 3rd index have ip? If so, what happens when you try to build a transaction on ip and user_name?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-build-a-transaction-from-multiple-somewhat-disparate/m-p/67627#M16895</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenAveling</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-16T06:22:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

