<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why dedup when we have stats values function in Splunk Search</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Why-dedup-when-we-have-stats-values-function/m-p/474620#M133465</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;@gcusello @woodcock @richgalloway &lt;BR /&gt;
Why do we need two functions for the same functionality?&lt;BR /&gt;
'dedup' displays unique values while 'stats values' do the same, is there any difference other than 'stats' is transforming command and 'dedup' is not?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 16:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>palisetty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-03T16:59:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why dedup when we have stats values function</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Why-dedup-when-we-have-stats-values-function/m-p/474620#M133465</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@gcusello @woodcock @richgalloway &lt;BR /&gt;
Why do we need two functions for the same functionality?&lt;BR /&gt;
'dedup' displays unique values while 'stats values' do the same, is there any difference other than 'stats' is transforming command and 'dedup' is not?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 16:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Why-dedup-when-we-have-stats-values-function/m-p/474620#M133465</guid>
      <dc:creator>palisetty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T16:59:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why dedup when we have stats values function</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Why-dedup-when-we-have-stats-values-function/m-p/474621#M133466</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Because there are times you want to dedup without using stats. So both commands are valid. If you are going to stats then you would be redundant to also use dedup.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 17:06:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Why-dedup-when-we-have-stats-values-function/m-p/474621#M133466</guid>
      <dc:creator>starcher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T17:06:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why dedup when we have stats values function</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Why-dedup-when-we-have-stats-values-function/m-p/474622#M133467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;stats&lt;/CODE&gt; transforms, so your original fields are no longer accessible. &lt;CODE&gt;dedup&lt;/CODE&gt; is a great way to limit the number of rows to be used further down the line, and still have full access to the fields and their values.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 17:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Why-dedup-when-we-have-stats-values-function/m-p/474622#M133467</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpolvino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T17:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

