<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Fine-tune Incident Review - Splunk ES in Splunk Enterprise Security</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469065#M7087</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;
We are using Splunk ES app in our environment and log sources are integrated to it and I am working on to make the logs CIM compatible.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As of now, we are getting thousands of notable events in Splunk ES incident review dashboard.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;While investigating the events, mostly those are false positive.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In the notable events, we could see success count is 320 and failed attempt count is 10 within a day. So it is not the correct behavior of brute force.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I also checked correlation rules associated with each event.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For example, brute force behavior correlation rule, it only considers success events count.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I need help to fine-tune these correlation rules as well as standard threshold count for all correlation rules in Splunk ES.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Could anyone please point me any document available in Splunk Docs which can fulfill my purpose?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you have fine-tuned these rules in your environment, then you could provide your guidance.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That would be a great help.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Tejas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tbavarva</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-23T10:03:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fine-tune Incident Review - Splunk ES</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469065#M7087</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;
We are using Splunk ES app in our environment and log sources are integrated to it and I am working on to make the logs CIM compatible.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As of now, we are getting thousands of notable events in Splunk ES incident review dashboard.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;While investigating the events, mostly those are false positive.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In the notable events, we could see success count is 320 and failed attempt count is 10 within a day. So it is not the correct behavior of brute force.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I also checked correlation rules associated with each event.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For example, brute force behavior correlation rule, it only considers success events count.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I need help to fine-tune these correlation rules as well as standard threshold count for all correlation rules in Splunk ES.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Could anyone please point me any document available in Splunk Docs which can fulfill my purpose?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you have fine-tuned these rules in your environment, then you could provide your guidance.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That would be a great help.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Tejas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469065#M7087</guid>
      <dc:creator>tbavarva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-23T10:03:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fine-tune Incident Review - Splunk ES</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469066#M7088</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All ES correlation searches can be (and should be) edited to suit your environment.  In ES, select Configure-&amp;gt;Content and choose "Correlation Search" from the Type dropdown.  Click on the search you want to modify.  Edit the search as necessary to fit your requirements.  There should be a &lt;CODE&gt;where&lt;/CODE&gt; clause containing the threshold for the notable event, but feel free to change any part of the search.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469066#M7088</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-23T14:05:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fine-tune Incident Review - Splunk ES</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469067#M7089</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/213957"&gt;@richgalloway&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for your kind response.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;base search
| xswhere failure from failures_by_src_count_1d in authentication is above medium
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can you please tell me what are these terms (failure, failures_by_src_count_1d, medium)?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Tejas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 03:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469067#M7089</guid>
      <dc:creator>tbavarva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T03:25:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fine-tune Incident Review - Splunk ES</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469068#M7090</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;IIRC, 'failure' is a field from the base search; 'failures_by_src_count_1d' is a lookup file maintained by the Extreme Search (XS) app; and 'medium' is a fuzzy measurement used by XS.  The definition of "medium" will vary over time with the number of failures detected.  You can change "medium" to "high" to create a higher threshold.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;See &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.3.1/Admin/Extremesearchreference" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.3.1/Admin/Extremesearchreference&lt;/A&gt; for more information.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;BTW, in ES 6.0 Extreme Search is replaced by the Machine Learning Toolkit.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 03:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469068#M7090</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T03:28:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fine-tune Incident Review - Splunk ES</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469069#M7091</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot @richgalloway That is what I wanted to know. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Fine-tune-Incident-Review-Splunk-ES/m-p/469069#M7091</guid>
      <dc:creator>tbavarva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-23T16:56:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

