<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What is the best method of calculating variance, Extreme Search or just Stats? in Splunk Enterprise Security</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/What-is-the-best-method-of-calculating-variance-Extreme-Search/m-p/395309#M4340</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Extreme search is "fuzzy". If you want precise traditional stats just do that. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>starcher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-15T14:34:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What is the best method of calculating variance, Extreme Search or just Stats?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/What-is-the-best-method-of-calculating-variance-Extreme-Search/m-p/395308#M4339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I currently have several behavioral anomaly searches that report users exhibiting authentication behavior that is X number of standard deviations above their mean or just in the 9Xth percentile based on a baseline period of behavior. After reading George Starcher's blog entries on the subject of Extreme Search I am considering implementing those searches using that app, but I am concerned that I am losing precision because I can't say for certain that "anomalous" means three standard deviations above the mean. I would like to hear about other users' experiences doing the same and whether you think the migration is worth the effort.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 17:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/What-is-the-best-method-of-calculating-variance-Extreme-Search/m-p/395308#M4339</guid>
      <dc:creator>joeldavideng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-08T17:43:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the best method of calculating variance, Extreme Search or just Stats?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/What-is-the-best-method-of-calculating-variance-Extreme-Search/m-p/395309#M4340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Extreme search is "fuzzy". If you want precise traditional stats just do that. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/What-is-the-best-method-of-calculating-variance-Extreme-Search/m-p/395309#M4340</guid>
      <dc:creator>starcher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-15T14:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the best method of calculating variance, Extreme Search or just Stats?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/What-is-the-best-method-of-calculating-variance-Extreme-Search/m-p/395310#M4341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Straight from the horse's mouth. Thanks Starcher.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 23:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/What-is-the-best-method-of-calculating-variance-Extreme-Search/m-p/395310#M4341</guid>
      <dc:creator>joeldavideng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-15T23:49:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

