<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Auditing Datamodels in Splunk Enterprise Security</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389299#M4167</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There is also the function &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/7.2.4/SearchReference/Fieldsummary"&gt;fieldsummary&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skalliger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-19T08:45:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Auditing Datamodels</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389296#M4164</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to validate the fields used in the datamodel by how compliant they are with the current setup?&lt;BR /&gt;
I am trying to validate and fix data models to receive optimum results in the Splunk ES.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Any tips regarding the issue will be appreciated,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389296#M4164</guid>
      <dc:creator>zekiramhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-15T09:57:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auditing Datamodels</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389297#M4165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Would this help? &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.2.2/Admin/Dashboardrequirements"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.2.2/Admin/Dashboardrequirements&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Also, for e.g. You can use | from datamodel "Authentication.Authentication" | fieldsummary for Authentication datamodel to check if all the datamodel fields are mapped and check the valued to see if they are related to your datasource.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:41:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389297#M4165</guid>
      <dc:creator>lakshman239</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-15T17:41:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auditing Datamodels</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389298#M4166</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;try this app&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2968/"&gt;https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2968/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 21:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389298#M4166</guid>
      <dc:creator>adonio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-15T21:37:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auditing Datamodels</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389299#M4167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is also the function &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/7.2.4/SearchReference/Fieldsummary"&gt;fieldsummary&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389299#M4167</guid>
      <dc:creator>skalliger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-19T08:45:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auditing Datamodels</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389300#M4168</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if you are happy with the answers provided and/or your issue resolved, can you pls accept the response to close tracking on this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:59:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389300#M4168</guid>
      <dc:creator>lakshman239</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-25T12:59:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auditing Datamodels</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389301#M4169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sure, Sorry im new to Splunk Answers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389301#M4169</guid>
      <dc:creator>zekiramhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-27T07:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auditing Datamodels</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389302#M4170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fantastic, Exactly what I needed. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise-Security/Auditing-Datamodels/m-p/389302#M4170</guid>
      <dc:creator>zekiramhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-27T12:31:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

