<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 32bit 2003 Server in #Random</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Random/32bit-2003-Server/m-p/88159#M656</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;32-bit versions of Windows have only a 2GB or 3 GB limit on process address space, making them undesirable for production instances on Splunk that may consume and report on large amounts of data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-07T00:22:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>32bit 2003 Server</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Random/32bit-2003-Server/m-p/88158#M655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why is 32bit 2003 server not recommended?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:25:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Random/32bit-2003-Server/m-p/88158#M655</guid>
      <dc:creator>joelsplace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-06T22:25:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 32bit 2003 Server</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Random/32bit-2003-Server/m-p/88159#M656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;32-bit versions of Windows have only a 2GB or 3 GB limit on process address space, making them undesirable for production instances on Splunk that may consume and report on large amounts of data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Random/32bit-2003-Server/m-p/88159#M656</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-07T00:22:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

