<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Testing performance of NFS in Monitoring Splunk</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Testing-performance-of-NFS/m-p/76348#M910</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;had a pile of bonnie++ output without knowledge of what it was I cared about.  this response saved me.  thx much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>toddmichael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T23:17:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Testing performance of NFS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Testing-performance-of-NFS/m-p/76346#M908</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've read in the docs that the disk performance should be 800 IOPs. How can I test this when the disk is NFS (I can't find a tool which shows IOPs for NFS filesystems)? &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I've also seen others here have tested NFS performance using bonnie, but what results should I be looking for since bonnie doesn't state IOPs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:20:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Testing-performance-of-NFS/m-p/76346#M908</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-07T07:20:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Testing performance of NFS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Testing-performance-of-NFS/m-p/76347#M909</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should use bonnie++. The IO/s is reported as the last column, random seeks/sec.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Testing-performance-of-NFS/m-p/76347#M909</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen_Sorkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-07T09:08:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Testing performance of NFS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Testing-performance-of-NFS/m-p/76348#M910</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;had a pile of bonnie++ output without knowledge of what it was I cared about.  this response saved me.  thx much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Testing-performance-of-NFS/m-p/76348#M910</guid>
      <dc:creator>toddmichael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-26T23:17:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

