<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers? in Monitoring Splunk</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428460#M6484</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hello there,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;i think that regardless its better to play it safe and give the new sites the numbers 3 and 4, unless you are considering moving data, which seems not to be the case here.&lt;BR /&gt;
having said that, the SH relay on the Indexer Cluster Master to identify the relevant indexers to search from. meaning, considering you have a new Cluster Master, it is safe to have the new sites as site1 and site2 since they are connected to a new Cluster Master.&lt;BR /&gt;
if you have a Monitoring Console (MC / DMC)  you can review which indexer cluster (and sites) belong to each Cluster Master&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adonio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-11T23:08:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428459#M6483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have our original multisite cluster with site1 and site2.  It will be decommissioned in 6 months when all of its indexes expire.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We built a new multisite cluster: should it be site 3 and site4?  I think it should be, so that our search head cluster will be able to search both clusters.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:34:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428459#M6483</guid>
      <dc:creator>lycollicott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-11T15:34:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428460#M6484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello there,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;i think that regardless its better to play it safe and give the new sites the numbers 3 and 4, unless you are considering moving data, which seems not to be the case here.&lt;BR /&gt;
having said that, the SH relay on the Indexer Cluster Master to identify the relevant indexers to search from. meaning, considering you have a new Cluster Master, it is safe to have the new sites as site1 and site2 since they are connected to a new Cluster Master.&lt;BR /&gt;
if you have a Monitoring Console (MC / DMC)  you can review which indexer cluster (and sites) belong to each Cluster Master&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428460#M6484</guid>
      <dc:creator>adonio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-11T23:08:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428461#M6485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We did a test at end of day yesterday with site1/2 and site 1/2, but the search head couldn't search the new site1/2 indexers.  We're going to test more today, but I think I agree that site 3/4 is safer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:21:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428461#M6485</guid>
      <dc:creator>lycollicott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T13:21:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428462#M6486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;are you using the same Cluster Master for the new Multisite Cluster?&lt;BR /&gt;
if you consider the question as answered, kindly mark it us such for others to know &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 14:28:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428462#M6486</guid>
      <dc:creator>adonio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T14:28:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428463#M6487</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Using site3/4 for the new cluster does work either.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Cluster A&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;Cluster Master -&amp;gt; site1
Cluster Peer -&amp;gt; site1
Cluster Peer -&amp;gt; site2
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Cluster B&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;Cluster Master -&amp;gt; site3
Cluster Peer -&amp;gt; site3
Cluster Peer -&amp;gt; site3
Cluster Peer -&amp;gt; site4
Cluster Peer -&amp;gt; site4
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We'll keep testing today.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:17:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428463#M6487</guid>
      <dc:creator>lycollicott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T15:17:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428464#M6488</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;do you have search affinity enabled?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Indexer/Multisitesearchaffinity"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Indexer/Multisitesearchaffinity&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
if you do, disable it.&lt;BR /&gt;
also, are you using a separate Indexer Cluster Master for new Multisite Cluster?&lt;BR /&gt;
did you connect the Search Head/s to the new Cluster Master?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428464#M6488</guid>
      <dc:creator>adonio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T15:37:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428465#M6489</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After a little more testing today, we have search working against both indexer clusters with site1 - site4.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428465#M6489</guid>
      <dc:creator>lycollicott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T20:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should our two multisite clusters have distinct site numbers?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428466#M6490</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we did both of those things.  We started by testing on a single search head  and that was successful yesterday, so we're actually pointing the rest of the SHC there right now.  I'm really happy with how it's working. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Should-our-two-multisite-clusters-have-distinct-site-numbers/m-p/428466#M6490</guid>
      <dc:creator>lycollicott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T13:54:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

