<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Raid 6, setting up for performance issues? in Monitoring Splunk</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124569#M1538</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes.  It's very likely.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Richfez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-15T20:56:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Raid 6, setting up for performance issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124568#M1537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Deploying new indexers and trying maximize the storage we have. Raid 6  was configured on 15K SAS drives for Hot/Warm buckets and Raid 6 on 10K SAS drives for Cold Buckets. We average around just under 250 GB of data / day. I keep reading to have Hot/Warm on Raid 10. So am I setting myself up for performance issues here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124568#M1537</guid>
      <dc:creator>xxyz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-15T20:24:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Raid 6, setting up for performance issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124569#M1538</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes.  It's very likely.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124569#M1538</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richfez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-15T20:56:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Raid 6, setting up for performance issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124570#M1539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you are setting yourself up for potential performance problems at that ingest rate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:56:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124570#M1539</guid>
      <dc:creator>jtrucks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-15T20:56:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Raid 6, setting up for performance issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124571#M1540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you can do Raid 10 instead for hot/warm buckets, that would be best.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:58:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124571#M1540</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbernt_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-15T20:58:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Raid 6, setting up for performance issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124572#M1541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Supposing, I wonder, whereby I found my self lost, that my internal dialogue was in fact a configuration 6 of Raid.  I thusly found myself feeling ill, as I had lost parity of my own thoughts, and slowly began to rebuild my nervous system of coherent thought. For while my thoughts worked correctly, I feel fine. At the mere mention of an unstable coaxial connection, I immediately began to slow and consume more resources to rebuild myself. I couldn't keep up with both the sensory input and the internal rebuild. I began to backlog until I crashed. Upon waking, I found myself in a corrupted state, even more so than most politicians. Wearily I tell you, begin your life in the 1+0 of Raid, and happier shall you be.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:03:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Monitoring-Splunk/Raid-6-setting-up-for-performance-issues/m-p/124572#M1541</guid>
      <dc:creator>alacercogitatus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-15T21:03:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

