<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: KV Store field type cidr in Knowledge Management</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440619#M3907</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Sadly, I did not further investigate or resolve this issue yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mathiask</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:09:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>KV Store field type cidr</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440617#M3905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Splunkers&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I just noticed that there is a field type "cidr" for the KV Store.&lt;BR /&gt;
According to the API documentation this should handle any kind of IP ranges nicely in canonical form.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/7.1.2/RESTREF/RESTkvstore#CIDR"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/7.1.2/RESTREF/RESTkvstore#CIDR&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Until now we used field type string&lt;BR /&gt;
field.netrange = string&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I created a new collection for testing with&lt;BR /&gt;
field.netrange = cidr&lt;BR /&gt;
and transferred the content with | inputlookup  | outputlookup &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But upon inspection | inputlookup &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I still observe the previous non-canonical IP ranges like 2001:620:2000::/48&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Did I do something wrong?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What is the benefit of using the field type cidr when there are no changes?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440617#M3905</guid>
      <dc:creator>mathiask</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-31T10:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KV Store field type cidr</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440618#M3906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have the same issue. @mathiask Did you ever get to resolve this issue? If so, Can you please share your solution here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440618#M3906</guid>
      <dc:creator>vsingla1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T00:12:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KV Store field type cidr</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440619#M3907</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sadly, I did not further investigate or resolve this issue yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440619#M3907</guid>
      <dc:creator>mathiask</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:09:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KV Store field type cidr</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440620#M3908</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no additional benefit. CIDR is implicit: &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.3.1/RESTREF/RESTkvstore"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.3.1/RESTREF/RESTkvstore&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440620#M3908</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephaniem_splu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-21T20:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KV Store field type cidr</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440621#M3909</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if I understand this correctly&lt;BR /&gt;
According to the documentation the field using field.cidr should be converted to a canonical CIDR address&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/7.2.5/RESTREF/RESTkvstore#CIDR"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/7.2.5/RESTREF/RESTkvstore#CIDR&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Could you sort elaborate on what you mean with implicit?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440621#M3909</guid>
      <dc:creator>mathiask</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-22T12:39:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KV Store field type cidr</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440622#M3910</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;2001:620:2000::/48 is already a canonical address. &lt;BR /&gt;
(I think its clearer with IPv4)&lt;BR /&gt;
172.16.14.0/24 is also a canonical address&lt;BR /&gt;
172.16.14.34 is NOT a canonical address, so this would be converted to its canonical version which would be:&lt;BR /&gt;
172.16.14.34/32&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Knowledge-Management/KV-Store-field-type-cidr/m-p/440622#M3910</guid>
      <dc:creator>nickhills</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-22T13:22:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

