<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Splunk License Violation - Investigate additional data for last 24hrs in Installation</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326141#M8067</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;"It depends" - Always a good answer. If you don't have lots of SQUASHED data, then the following searches can help you out.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;To find out what index has the most data, use the following search:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index=_internal source=*license_usage.log type="Usage" | stats sum(b) as total by idx | eval totalGB=total/1024/1024/1024 | fields idx, totalGB | sort -totalGB
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;To find out which host is the big offender:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index=_internal source=*license_usage.log type="Usage" | eval h=if(len(h)=0 OR isnull(h),"(SQUASHED)",h) | eval s=if(len(s)=0 OR isnull(s),"(SQUASHED)",s) | eval idx=if(len(idx)=0 OR isnull(idx),"CM",idx) | stats sum(b) as b by h, idx | eval GB=(b/1024/1024/1024) | sort -GB | fields - b
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Squashed data is what you get when there are too many entries in a given time period for Splunk to separate things out by host. Usually this isn't a problem until you get LOTS of forwarders.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:41:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cpetterborg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-25T16:41:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Splunk License Violation - Investigate additional data for last 24hrs</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326140#M8066</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Last night the license usage passed 95%, which used to float around 60-65%. There would definitely be additional host or logs started ingesting data yesterday. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is there a way I can trace down if any source or host is added within last 24hrs or if I can find who impacted the license usage?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:27:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326140#M8066</guid>
      <dc:creator>gagandeep_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-25T15:27:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk License Violation - Investigate additional data for last 24hrs</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326141#M8067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"It depends" - Always a good answer. If you don't have lots of SQUASHED data, then the following searches can help you out.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;To find out what index has the most data, use the following search:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index=_internal source=*license_usage.log type="Usage" | stats sum(b) as total by idx | eval totalGB=total/1024/1024/1024 | fields idx, totalGB | sort -totalGB
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;To find out which host is the big offender:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index=_internal source=*license_usage.log type="Usage" | eval h=if(len(h)=0 OR isnull(h),"(SQUASHED)",h) | eval s=if(len(s)=0 OR isnull(s),"(SQUASHED)",s) | eval idx=if(len(idx)=0 OR isnull(idx),"CM",idx) | stats sum(b) as b by h, idx | eval GB=(b/1024/1024/1024) | sort -GB | fields - b
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Squashed data is what you get when there are too many entries in a given time period for Splunk to separate things out by host. Usually this isn't a problem until you get LOTS of forwarders.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:41:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326141#M8067</guid>
      <dc:creator>cpetterborg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-25T16:41:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk License Violation - Investigate additional data for last 24hrs</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326142#M8068</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was not something specific I was looking for but this was interesting,, Cheers..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326142#M8068</guid>
      <dc:creator>gagandeep_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-26T16:52:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk License Violation - Investigate additional data for last 24hrs</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326143#M8069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My answer was in reply to your:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or if I can find who impacted the license usage&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 17:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326143#M8069</guid>
      <dc:creator>cpetterborg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-28T17:54:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk License Violation - Investigate additional data for last 24hrs</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326144#M8070</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;be careful on one aspect as "license" is calculated based on _indextime, but when you search data on the host it is _time (eventtime) which might span multiple days.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2017 16:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Splunk-License-Violation-Investigate-additional-data-for-last/m-p/326144#M8070</guid>
      <dc:creator>koshyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-29T16:45:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

