<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Creating multiple license pools in Installation</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Creating-multiple-license-pools/m-p/137619#M2279</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi chimbudp,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;the main purpose for License pools is that you can define a pool of license volume from a given license license stack and specify other indexing Splunk instances as members of that pool for the purposes of volume usage and tracking. Let's say you have three departments A, B &amp;amp; C all together provide some money to buy the license, but C provides to most. So you create a larger pool only for C and the rest for A &amp;amp; B.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This is only a basic example but it shows how you can use license pooling.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Following the answers to your questions:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;you can as well allow any indexer to use any license pool.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;you're right nobody wants that. But on the other the would be a reason to limit the size of the pool so this would be a good way to 'force' people to keep the data usage low.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;no license pooling does not have any performance impact.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;see the example at the top&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Just in case you havn't read it already, here is the docs about &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.0.1/Admin/Groups,stacks,pools,andotherterminology"&gt;License Groups,stacks &amp;amp; pools&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;hope this helps ...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;cheers, MuS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MuS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-05T09:53:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creating multiple license pools</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Creating-multiple-license-pools/m-p/137618#M2278</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the primary advantage of having multiple license pools ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;1.If i do not have license pool also i can point any number of slaves to the default pool and index the data.&lt;BR /&gt;
2.When i have multiple pools and say limit the size of a pool to low volume. Once the volume is reached license warnings will be thrown. No one wants this scenario.&lt;BR /&gt;
3.Does this have any performance boost?&lt;BR /&gt;
4.What kind of differentiation I am benefited by this license pool concept ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Creating-multiple-license-pools/m-p/137618#M2278</guid>
      <dc:creator>chimbudp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-05T09:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating multiple license pools</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Creating-multiple-license-pools/m-p/137619#M2279</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi chimbudp,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;the main purpose for License pools is that you can define a pool of license volume from a given license license stack and specify other indexing Splunk instances as members of that pool for the purposes of volume usage and tracking. Let's say you have three departments A, B &amp;amp; C all together provide some money to buy the license, but C provides to most. So you create a larger pool only for C and the rest for A &amp;amp; B.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This is only a basic example but it shows how you can use license pooling.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Following the answers to your questions:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;you can as well allow any indexer to use any license pool.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;you're right nobody wants that. But on the other the would be a reason to limit the size of the pool so this would be a good way to 'force' people to keep the data usage low.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;no license pooling does not have any performance impact.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;see the example at the top&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Just in case you havn't read it already, here is the docs about &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.0.1/Admin/Groups,stacks,pools,andotherterminology"&gt;License Groups,stacks &amp;amp; pools&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;hope this helps ...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;cheers, MuS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Installation/Creating-multiple-license-pools/m-p/137619#M2279</guid>
      <dc:creator>MuS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-05T09:53:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

