<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Splunk Forwarder HA load balancing in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Splunk-Forwarder-HA-load-balancing/m-p/50520#M9652</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The forwarders behavior "out of the box" is to forward data to whatever indexers that are available.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In you scenario your secondary indexer could be turned off by default (i.e. not running) - and with some script check if your primary indexer is not running. If the primary indexer is not running - then start the secondary indexer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Seen from the forwarder point of view - this is a "no-brainer" as it will buffer any inputs if your primary indexer dies until it can deliver to your secondary indexer (and vice versa).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The problem with this approach might be if you need to search the data from your primary indexer if this becomes unavailable.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have not tried this my self - but this should work.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Another approach is to deploy a network load-balancer in front of both indexers, and let this device send data to either your primary or your secondary indexer. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RubenOlsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-13T10:16:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Splunk Forwarder HA load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Splunk-Forwarder-HA-load-balancing/m-p/50519#M9651</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know that we could configure Auto-load balancing on multiple indexer. &lt;BR /&gt;
But I want to use an active standby approach to license count on duplicated data. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In this case, could I configure the forwarder to route all the event an indexer primarily and route to another indexer when primarily indexer is not available. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:19:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Splunk-Forwarder-HA-load-balancing/m-p/50519#M9651</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexlee-mv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T07:19:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk Forwarder HA load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Splunk-Forwarder-HA-load-balancing/m-p/50520#M9652</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The forwarders behavior "out of the box" is to forward data to whatever indexers that are available.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In you scenario your secondary indexer could be turned off by default (i.e. not running) - and with some script check if your primary indexer is not running. If the primary indexer is not running - then start the secondary indexer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Seen from the forwarder point of view - this is a "no-brainer" as it will buffer any inputs if your primary indexer dies until it can deliver to your secondary indexer (and vice versa).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The problem with this approach might be if you need to search the data from your primary indexer if this becomes unavailable.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have not tried this my self - but this should work.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Another approach is to deploy a network load-balancer in front of both indexers, and let this device send data to either your primary or your secondary indexer. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Splunk-Forwarder-HA-load-balancing/m-p/50520#M9652</guid>
      <dc:creator>RubenOlsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T10:16:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

