<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Index Performance in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544018#M90807</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes we have roughly 6k IOPS available on the backend storage, we have 3 indexers currently. We have not tried&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Summary indexes or Accelerated DataModels as of yet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jmc94</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-16T15:03:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Index Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544015#M90805</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an index that is feeding in data from an EKS/K8s infrastructure and getting roughly 4million events / 15 minutes (during peak). The index is doing roughly 80GB/day.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running queries on the data works great if you search within the current day however running historical searches on the data even using the proper fields specific to what I want to search for takes a very long time and the load on my indexers shoots up very high.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not modified any of the index params for this index in indexes.conf. This is a smartstore index and I have roughly 500GB of cache setup for caching locally. If anyone could let me know what tweaks might be best for this it would be greatly appreciated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:55:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544015#M90805</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmc94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-16T14:55:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Index Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544017#M90806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/229593"&gt;@jmc94&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;having so many data it's possible to have delays in answers with old data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first question is: what performances have you on that storage?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you at least 800 IOPS (better 1200) both on the storage for hot and warm data and also for cold data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you tried to accelerate your searches (using Summary indexes or Accelerated DataModels)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544017#M90806</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-16T15:00:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Index Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544018#M90807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes we have roughly 6k IOPS available on the backend storage, we have 3 indexers currently. We have not tried&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Summary indexes or Accelerated DataModels as of yet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544018#M90807</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmc94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-16T15:03:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Index Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544019#M90808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/229593"&gt;@jmc94&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have a correct infrastructure, having so many events, the only way is accelere your searches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544019#M90808</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-16T15:07:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Index Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544121#M90817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/229593"&gt;@jmc94&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you have problem only on historical searches, it show that eviction and downloading the buckets from SmartStore takes time. You can check if there is a bandwidth limitation issue between indexers and S3 compatible storage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please be sure that your&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;maxDataSize is auto as recommended. If you are using as auto_high_volume it will take much more time on downloading from SmartStore.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also if the storage is a kind of Scale-out NAS solution, 6k IOPS shown in tests does not work with the way Splunk uses S3. You can check download actions and durations/sizes from internal logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;index=_internal component=CacheManager&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Index-Performance/m-p/544121#M90817</guid>
      <dc:creator>scelikok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-17T06:28:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

