<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Promoting new source from test index in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Promoting-new-source-from-test-index/m-p/477189#M81917</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Splunk does not avoid duplicates, but it does avoid re-reading file data it's already read (a fine distinction).  To force Splunk to re-index the files, you'll need to erase the "bookmarks" for those files.  Use the &lt;CODE&gt;btprobe&lt;/CODE&gt; command for that.  Splunk must be stopped before running &lt;CODE&gt;btprobe&lt;/CODE&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;splunk stop
splunk btprobe -d $SPLUNK_HOME/var/lib/splunk/fishbucket/splunk_private_db --file &amp;lt;filename&amp;gt; --reset 
splunk start
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:58:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-09T15:58:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Promoting new source from test index</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Promoting-new-source-from-test-index/m-p/477188#M81916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm adding a new input (UNC directory) and due to previous lessons learned, I took from best practice and sent events to a sandbox index while I fine tuned source types etc. Now I'm happy with the config and want to move the input to my "Production" index.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Other than modifying the source config to point to the new index, what do I need to do to have all the existing files reindexed to the new index? Previous attempts have only sent new events to the new index, Splunk seems to be avoiding duplicates, even across two indexes.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;There is existing data in the new index that I don;t want to disturb, the sandbox index can be blown away if that matters.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:14:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Promoting-new-source-from-test-index/m-p/477188#M81916</guid>
      <dc:creator>davidbann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-09T15:14:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Promoting new source from test index</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Promoting-new-source-from-test-index/m-p/477189#M81917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Splunk does not avoid duplicates, but it does avoid re-reading file data it's already read (a fine distinction).  To force Splunk to re-index the files, you'll need to erase the "bookmarks" for those files.  Use the &lt;CODE&gt;btprobe&lt;/CODE&gt; command for that.  Splunk must be stopped before running &lt;CODE&gt;btprobe&lt;/CODE&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;splunk stop
splunk btprobe -d $SPLUNK_HOME/var/lib/splunk/fishbucket/splunk_private_db --file &amp;lt;filename&amp;gt; --reset 
splunk start
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:58:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Promoting-new-source-from-test-index/m-p/477189#M81917</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-09T15:58:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

