<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Are &amp;quot;_meta&amp;quot;-entries still supported in inputs.conf? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Are-quot-meta-quot-entries-still-supported-in-inputs-conf/m-p/42616#M7956</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe that the documented procedure to write to the meta file using a transforms to do so is here:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Data/Configureindex-timefieldextraction"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Data/Configureindex-timefieldextraction&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;While it may be undocumented to use the _meta field in the inputs.conf file on a forwarder, this is currently still a valid method for adding metadata to your fields. Take a look at the following answer post: &lt;A href="http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/1453/how-do-i-add-metadata-to-events-coming-from-a-splunk-forwarder"&gt;http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/1453/how-do-i-add-metadata-to-events-coming-from-a-splunk-forwarder&lt;/A&gt; as it mentions this method as well. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;So you may want to move the _meta field from the forwarders inputs.conf file to the transforms.conf file on the indexer. This might be easier to maintain in the future as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-07T19:01:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are "_meta"-entries still supported in inputs.conf?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Are-quot-meta-quot-entries-still-supported-in-inputs-conf/m-p/42615#M7955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've configured inputs.conf on a universal forwarder with&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
[monitor:///somefile.log]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
 _meta = testkey::testvalue&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
[monitor:///anotherfile.log]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
 _meta = testkey::testvalue&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
[monitor:///yetanotherfile.log]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
 _meta = testkey::anothervalue  &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;and added an entry to fields.conf on the indexer:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
[testkey]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
INDEXED=true&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This works perfectly fine (I can use the testkey field in searches) , but the forwarder complains of a "possible typo", and I can find no reference to the "_meta" notation in the current documentation. Is this an "undocumented feature" that may disappear? Is there an alternative way to mark events for a monitored file with no other dependencies or side effects? (I'd like to keep the standard use of the source, sourcetype, and host fields, independent of the "categorization" that I implement with _meta).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:54:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Are-quot-meta-quot-entries-still-supported-in-inputs-conf/m-p/42615#M7955</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikaeln</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-23T13:54:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are "_meta"-entries still supported in inputs.conf?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Are-quot-meta-quot-entries-still-supported-in-inputs-conf/m-p/42616#M7956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe that the documented procedure to write to the meta file using a transforms to do so is here:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Data/Configureindex-timefieldextraction"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Data/Configureindex-timefieldextraction&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;While it may be undocumented to use the _meta field in the inputs.conf file on a forwarder, this is currently still a valid method for adding metadata to your fields. Take a look at the following answer post: &lt;A href="http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/1453/how-do-i-add-metadata-to-events-coming-from-a-splunk-forwarder"&gt;http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/1453/how-do-i-add-metadata-to-events-coming-from-a-splunk-forwarder&lt;/A&gt; as it mentions this method as well. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;So you may want to move the _meta field from the forwarders inputs.conf file to the transforms.conf file on the indexer. This might be easier to maintain in the future as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Are-quot-meta-quot-entries-still-supported-in-inputs-conf/m-p/42616#M7956</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-07T19:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are "_meta"-entries still supported in inputs.conf?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Are-quot-meta-quot-entries-still-supported-in-inputs-conf/m-p/42617#M7957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The procedure in inputs.conf still works.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;remarks : &lt;BR /&gt;
 - the "_meta" field was triggering a typo warning because it was not in the inputs.spec, this is fixed now.&lt;BR /&gt;
 - for modular inputs (wineventlog by example), for splunk 6.* and 6.1.&lt;EM&gt;, the _meta fields were not passed to the indexes. This is fixed since 6.2.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
 - in order to make the meta fields searchable. they have to be added to the fields.conf on the search-head.&lt;BR /&gt;
 -&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Are-quot-meta-quot-entries-still-supported-in-inputs-conf/m-p/42617#M7957</guid>
      <dc:creator>yannK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-24T22:14:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

